From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta7.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta7.messagelabs.com [216.82.255.55]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F4A6B0012 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:22:43 -0400 (EDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC2ABF.FE7E792D" Subject: RE: [PATCH] REPOST: Memory tracking for physical machine migration Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:17:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20110610231850.6327.24452.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20110611075516.GA7745@infradead.org> From: "Paradis, James" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC2ABF.FE7E792D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org] > =20 > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:19:06PM -0400, Jim Paradis wrote: >> [tried posting this a couple days ago... kept having formatting = problems >> with the exchange server. Let's see how this works...] >=20 > Much more important is the problem that the patch is utterly useless > as-is. It just adds adds exports, but no real functionality. It's = not > like I have told you exactly that a million times before, but given = that > you don't want to listen it might just be easier to ignore your = patches. Okay, then, help me out here. What would it take for this to be = accepted? Would you like us to incorporate the memory-harvesting code from LKSM as = well? --jim ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC2ABF.FE7E792D Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: [PATCH] REPOST: Memory tracking for physical machine = migration


-----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org]
> 
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:19:06PM -0400, Jim Paradis wrote:
>> [tried posting this a couple days ago... kept having formatting = problems
>> with the exchange server.  Let's see how this = works...]
>
> Much more important is the problem that the patch is utterly = useless
> as-is.  It just adds adds exports, but no real = functionality.  It's not
> like I have told you exactly that a million times before, but given = that
> you don't want to listen it might just be easier to ignore your = patches.

Okay, then, help me out here.  What would it take for this to be = accepted?
Would you like us to incorporate the memory-harvesting code from LKSM as = well?

--jim

------_=_NextPart_001_01CC2ABF.FE7E792D-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org