From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
Cc: Matt <jackdachef@gmail.com>,
gregkh@suse.de, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
ngupta@vflare.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>,
Yan Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] drivers/staging: zcache: dynamic page cache/swap compression
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:36:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim_U+mJtHk7drvqMOmUwd4ro8J0dazZMDsNqH=o@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e647042e-419e-4e61-a563-e489596bd659@default>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Dan Magenheimer
<dan.magenheimer@oracle.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matt [mailto:jackdachef@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 5:12 PM
>> To: Minchan Kim
>> Cc: Dan Magenheimer; gregkh@suse.de; Chris Mason; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-mm@kvack.org; ngupta@vflare.org; linux-
>> btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Josef Bacik; Dan Rosenberg; Yan Zheng;
>> miaox@cn.fujitsu.com; Li Zefan
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] drivers/staging: zcache: dynamic page
>> cache/swap compression
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
>> > Just my guessing. I might be wrong.
>> >
>> > __cleancache_flush_inode calls cleancache_get_key with
>> cleancache_filekey.
>> > cleancache_file_key's size is just 6 * u32.
>> > cleancache_get_key calls btrfs_encode_fh with the key.
>> > but btrfs_encode_fh does typecasting the key to btrfs_fid which is
>> > bigger size than cleancache_filekey's one so it should not access
>> > fields beyond cleancache_get_key.
>> >
>> > I think some file systems use extend fid so in there, this problem
>> can
>> > happen. I don't know why we can't find it earlier. Maybe Dan and
>> > others test it for a long time.
>> >
>> > Am I missing something?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Kind regards,
>> > Minchan Kim
>> >
>>
>> reposting Minchan's message for reference to the btrfs mailing list
>> while also adding
>>
>> Li Zefan, Miao Xie, Yan Zheng, Dan Rosenberg and Josef Bacik to CC
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Matt
>
> Hi Matt and Minchan --
>
> (BTRFS EXPERTS SEE *** BELOW)
>
> I definitely see a bug in cleancache_get_key in the monolithic
> zcache+cleancache+frontswap patch I posted on oss.oracle.com
> that is corrected in linux-next but I don't see how it could
> get provoked by btrfs.
>
> The bug is that, in cleancache_get_key, the return value of fhfn should
> be checked against 255. If the return value is 255, cleancache_get_key
> should return -1. This should disable cleancache for any filesystem
> where KEY_MAX is too large.
>
> But cleancache_get_key always calls fhfn with connectable == 0 and
> CLEANCACHE_KEY_MAX==6 should be greater than BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE
> (which I think should be 5?). And the elements written into the
> typecast btrfs_fid should be only writing the first 5 32-bit words.
BTRFS_FID_SIZE_NON_CONNECTALBE is 5, not BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE.
Anyway, you passed connectable with 0 so it should be only writing the
first 5 32-bit words as you said.
That's one I missed. ;-)
Thanks.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 3:24 Dan Magenheimer
2011-02-09 1:03 ` Dan Magenheimer
2011-02-09 2:32 ` Nitin Gupta
2011-02-14 0:08 ` Matt
2011-02-14 1:24 ` Matt
2011-02-14 1:29 ` Matt
2011-02-14 4:35 ` Minchan Kim
2011-02-16 0:12 ` Matt
2011-02-16 1:27 ` Dan Magenheimer
2011-02-16 1:58 ` Matt
2011-02-16 4:36 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2011-03-03 17:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2011-02-14 20:59 ` Matt
2011-02-15 23:48 ` Matt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTim_U+mJtHk7drvqMOmUwd4ro8J0dazZMDsNqH=o@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jackdachef@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox