From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: Make move_active_pages_to_lru more generic
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:50:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimVvgKuND8tVyubkanEr5L4Vgy66jiOqxpF7ZQ_@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101122013655.GA10126@localhost>
Hi Wu,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:24:56PM +0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Now move_active_pages_to_lru can move pages into active or inactive.
>> if it moves the pages into inactive, it itself can clear PG_acive.
>> It makes the function more generic.
>
> Do you plan to use this "more generic" function? Because the patch in
> itself makes code slightly less efficient. It adds one "if" test, and
> moves one operation into the spin lock.
I tried to use it in my deactivate page series but couldn't use it due
some problem.
So I don't have a plan to use it. It's just my preference(and I hope
others think like me :) )
I hope function itself would be generic and clear because some people
in future might use it and reference it.
If my change makes big cost, I am not against you. otherwise, I hope
move_active_pages_to_lru become self-contained.
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-22 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 14:24 Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 18:07 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-22 0:49 ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-22 1:26 ` Rik van Riel
2010-11-22 1:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-11-22 1:50 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimVvgKuND8tVyubkanEr5L4Vgy66jiOqxpF7ZQ_@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox