From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3570D8D0001 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:11:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so6895896iwn.14 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:11:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:11:42 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: prefer [kv]zalloc over [kv]malloc+memset in memory controller code. From: Minchan Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Jesper Juhl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.or, linux-mm@kvack.org, Balbir Singh , Pavel Emelianov , Paul Menage , Li Zefan , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Hi (please CC me on replies), > > In mem_cgroup_alloc() we currently do either kmalloc() or vmalloc() then > followed by memset() to zero the memory. This can be more efficiently > achieved by using kzalloc() and vzalloc(). > > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org