linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Yakui Zhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:35:22 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilVVKdLNC0OJfVv5N5GGXL9bwXJfOLC5NHE-Qc4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100714161045.ef028769.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:44:41 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Kame.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:23 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
>> <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:44:23 +0900
>> > Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > If you _really_ can't make the section size smaller, and the vast
>> >> > majority of the sections are fully populated, you could hack something
>> >> > in.  We could, for instance, have a global list that's mostly readonly
>> >> > which tells you which sections need to be have their sizes closely
>> >> > inspected.  That would work OK if, for instance, you only needed to
>> >> > check a couple of memory sections in the system.  It'll start to suck if
>> >> > you made the lists very long.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for advise. As I say, I hope Russell accept 16M section.
>> >>
>> >
>> > It seems what I needed was good sleep....
>> > How about this if 16M section is not acceptable ?
>> >
>> > == NOT TESTED AT ALL, EVEN NOT COMPILED ==
>> >
>> > register address of mem_section to memmap itself's page struct's pg->private field.
>> > This means the page is used for memmap of the section.
>> > Otherwise, the page is used for other purpose and memmap has a hole.
>>
>> It's a very good idea. :)
>> But can this handle case that a page on memmap pages have struct page
>> descriptor of hole?
>> I mean one page can include 128 page descriptor(4096 / 32).
> yes.
>
>> In there, 64 page descriptor is valid but remain 64 page descriptor is on hole.
>> In this case, free_memmap doesn't free the page.
>
> yes. but in that case, there are valid page decriptor for 64pages of holes.
> pfn_valid() should return true but PG_reserved is set.
> (This is usual behavior.)
>
> My intention is that
>
>  - When all 128 page descriptors are unused, free_memmap() will free it.
>   In that case, clear page->private of a page for freed page descriptors.
>
>  - When some of page descriptors are used, free_memmap() can't free it
>   and page->private points to &mem_section. We may have memmap for memory
>   hole but pfn_valid() is a function to check there is memmap or not.
>   The bahavior of pfn_valid() is valid.
>   Anyway, you can't free only half of page.

Okay. I missed PageReserved.
Your idea seems to be good. :)

I looked at pagetypeinfo_showblockcount_print.
It doesn't check PageReserved. Instead of it, it does ugly memmap_valid_within.
Can't we remove it and change it with PageReserved?


-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-14  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-12 15:53 Minchan Kim
2010-07-12 23:59 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-13  3:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13  4:11   ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13  4:23     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13  6:04       ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13  6:40         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13  8:06           ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13  8:03             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13  7:20         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13  7:34           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13  7:58             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13  8:02               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 18:39                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13 20:46                   ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-13  9:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-07-13 15:43   ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 16:35     ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-13 16:44       ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-14  0:23         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14  6:44           ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-14  7:10             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14  7:35               ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-07-14  7:39                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14  7:50           ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-14  8:09             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13  9:37 ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-13  9:46   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13 10:00     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTilVVKdLNC0OJfVv5N5GGXL9bwXJfOLC5NHE-Qc4@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox