From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Yakui Zhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:35:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilVVKdLNC0OJfVv5N5GGXL9bwXJfOLC5NHE-Qc4@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100714161045.ef028769.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:10 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:44:41 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Kame.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:23 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
>> <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:44:23 +0900
>> > Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > If you _really_ can't make the section size smaller, and the vast
>> >> > majority of the sections are fully populated, you could hack something
>> >> > in. We could, for instance, have a global list that's mostly readonly
>> >> > which tells you which sections need to be have their sizes closely
>> >> > inspected. That would work OK if, for instance, you only needed to
>> >> > check a couple of memory sections in the system. It'll start to suck if
>> >> > you made the lists very long.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for advise. As I say, I hope Russell accept 16M section.
>> >>
>> >
>> > It seems what I needed was good sleep....
>> > How about this if 16M section is not acceptable ?
>> >
>> > == NOT TESTED AT ALL, EVEN NOT COMPILED ==
>> >
>> > register address of mem_section to memmap itself's page struct's pg->private field.
>> > This means the page is used for memmap of the section.
>> > Otherwise, the page is used for other purpose and memmap has a hole.
>>
>> It's a very good idea. :)
>> But can this handle case that a page on memmap pages have struct page
>> descriptor of hole?
>> I mean one page can include 128 page descriptor(4096 / 32).
> yes.
>
>> In there, 64 page descriptor is valid but remain 64 page descriptor is on hole.
>> In this case, free_memmap doesn't free the page.
>
> yes. but in that case, there are valid page decriptor for 64pages of holes.
> pfn_valid() should return true but PG_reserved is set.
> (This is usual behavior.)
>
> My intention is that
>
> - When all 128 page descriptors are unused, free_memmap() will free it.
> In that case, clear page->private of a page for freed page descriptors.
>
> - When some of page descriptors are used, free_memmap() can't free it
> and page->private points to &mem_section. We may have memmap for memory
> hole but pfn_valid() is a function to check there is memmap or not.
> The bahavior of pfn_valid() is valid.
> Anyway, you can't free only half of page.
Okay. I missed PageReserved.
Your idea seems to be good. :)
I looked at pagetypeinfo_showblockcount_print.
It doesn't check PageReserved. Instead of it, it does ugly memmap_valid_within.
Can't we remove it and change it with PageReserved?
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-14 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-12 15:53 Minchan Kim
2010-07-12 23:59 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-13 3:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 4:11 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 4:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 6:04 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 6:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 8:06 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 8:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 7:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13 7:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 7:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 8:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 18:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13 20:46 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-13 9:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-07-13 15:43 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 16:35 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-13 16:44 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-14 0:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14 6:44 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-14 7:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14 7:35 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-07-14 7:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14 7:50 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-14 8:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 9:37 ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-13 9:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13 10:00 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTilVVKdLNC0OJfVv5N5GGXL9bwXJfOLC5NHE-Qc4@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox