From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vmscan: shrink_slab() require number of lru_pages, not page order
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:44:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikwsuuZHJxK0+1mdJVLZ7vw3r4oZBQrzuowLQXE@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100716090302.7351.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:39 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > nr_slab_pages0 = zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE);
>> > if (nr_slab_pages0 > zone->min_slab_pages) {
>> > + unsigned long lru_pages = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
>> > +
>> > /*
>> > * shrink_slab() does not currently allow us to determine how
>> > * many pages were freed in this zone. So we take the current
>> > @@ -2622,7 +2624,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>> > * Note that shrink_slab will free memory on all zones and may
>> > * take a long time.
>> > */
>> > - while (shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, gfp_mask, order) &&
>> > + while (shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, gfp_mask, lru_pages) &&
>> > (zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) + nr_pages >
>> > nr_slab_pages0))
>> > ;
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to recalculate zone_reclaimable_pages() each time
>> around the loop? For example, shrink_icache_memory()->prune_icache()
>> will remove pagecache from an inode if it hits the tail of the list.
>> This can change the number of reclaimable pages by squigabytes, but
>> this code thinks nothing changed?
>
> Ah, I missed this. incrementa patch is here.
>
> thank you!
>
>
>
> From 8f7c70cfb4a25f8292a59564db6c3ff425a69b53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:40:01 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] vmscan: recalculate lru_pages on each shrink_slab()
>
> Andrew Morton pointed out shrink_slab() may change number of reclaimable
> pages (e.g. shrink_icache_memory()->prune_icache() will remove unmapped
> pagecache).
>
> So, we need to recalculate lru_pages on each shrink_slab() calling.
> This patch fixes it.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
It does make sense.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-16 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-08 7:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] vmscan: don't subtraction of unsined KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vmscan: shrink_slab() require number of lru_pages, not page order KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 13:23 ` Rik van Riel
2010-07-08 14:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-08 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-08 21:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09 0:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09 8:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09 10:13 ` [PATCH] vmscan: stop meaningless loop iteration when no reclaimable slab KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09 10:53 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-09 11:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-11 22:28 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 4:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-13 6:33 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-09 14:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-13 4:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09 8:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vmscan: shrink_slab() require number of lru_pages, not page order Minchan Kim
2010-07-09 13:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-13 5:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-15 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-16 1:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-16 1:44 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-07-08 7:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vmscan: don't subtraction of unsined KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 14:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-08 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-09 1:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09 1:46 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-09 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-13 9:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-14 1:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14 2:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikwsuuZHJxK0+1mdJVLZ7vw3r4oZBQrzuowLQXE@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox