linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vmscan: shrink_slab() require number of lru_pages, not page order
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:44:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikwsuuZHJxK0+1mdJVLZ7vw3r4oZBQrzuowLQXE@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100716090302.7351.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:39 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> >     nr_slab_pages0 = zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE);
>> >     if (nr_slab_pages0 > zone->min_slab_pages) {
>> > +           unsigned long lru_pages = zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
>> > +
>> >             /*
>> >              * shrink_slab() does not currently allow us to determine how
>> >              * many pages were freed in this zone. So we take the current
>> > @@ -2622,7 +2624,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>> >              * Note that shrink_slab will free memory on all zones and may
>> >              * take a long time.
>> >              */
>> > -           while (shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, gfp_mask, order) &&
>> > +           while (shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, gfp_mask, lru_pages) &&
>> >                    (zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) + nr_pages >
>> >                     nr_slab_pages0))
>> >                     ;
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to recalculate zone_reclaimable_pages() each time
>> around the loop?  For example, shrink_icache_memory()->prune_icache()
>> will remove pagecache from an inode if it hits the tail of the list.
>> This can change the number of reclaimable pages by squigabytes, but
>> this code thinks nothing changed?
>
> Ah, I missed this. incrementa patch is here.
>
> thank you!
>
>
>
> From 8f7c70cfb4a25f8292a59564db6c3ff425a69b53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:40:01 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] vmscan: recalculate lru_pages on each shrink_slab()
>
> Andrew Morton pointed out shrink_slab() may change number of reclaimable
> pages (e.g. shrink_icache_memory()->prune_icache() will remove unmapped
> pagecache).
>
> So, we need to recalculate lru_pages on each shrink_slab() calling.
> This patch fixes it.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>

It does make sense.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-16  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-08  7:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] vmscan: don't subtraction of unsined KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08  7:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vmscan: shrink_slab() require number of lru_pages, not page order KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 13:23   ` Rik van Riel
2010-07-08 14:04   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-08 20:31     ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-08 21:01       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-09  0:46         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09  8:21       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09 10:13         ` [PATCH] vmscan: stop meaningless loop iteration when no reclaimable slab KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09 10:53           ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-09 11:04             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-11 22:28               ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13  4:48                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-13  6:33                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-09 14:02           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-13  4:59             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09  8:36   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vmscan: shrink_slab() require number of lru_pages, not page order Minchan Kim
2010-07-09 13:54     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-13  5:41     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-15 19:15       ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-16  1:39         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-16  1:44           ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-07-08  7:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vmscan: don't subtraction of unsined KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-08 14:01   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-08 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-09  1:16   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-09  1:46     ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-09 22:28     ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-13  9:32       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-14  1:50         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-14  2:15           ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTikwsuuZHJxK0+1mdJVLZ7vw3r4oZBQrzuowLQXE@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox