On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:

> On Wed,  2 Mar 2011 16:38:06 +0800 Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> > From: Liu Yuan <tailai.ly@taobao.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yuan <tailai.ly@taobao.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig.debug |    9 +++++++++
> >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> > index 615e188..f29e32d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -304,4 +304,13 @@ config DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
> >
> >         If unsure, or if you run an older (pre 4.4) gcc, say N.
> >
> > +config PAGE_CACHE_ACCT
> > +     bool "Page cache accounting"
> > +     ---help---
> > +       Enabling this options to account for page cache hit/missed number
> of
> > +       times. This would allow user space applications get better
> knowledge
> > +       of underlying page cache system by reading virtual file. The
> statitics
> > +       per partition are collected.
> > +
> > +       If unsure, say N.
> >  endmenu
> > --
>
> rewrite:
>
>          Enable this option to provide for page cache hit/miss counters.
>          This allows userspace applications to obtain better knowledge of
> the
>          underlying page cache subsystem by reading a virtual file.
>          Statistics are collect per partition.
>
> questions:
>        what virtual file?
>        what kind of partition?
>
>
Hi Randy,

Thanks for your correction.

'virtual file' in this patch context means files in sysfs mounted at /sys.
'partition' indicates that every disk partition (like
/dev/sda/{sda1,sda2...} has its own accountings for page cache information.

I am not confident about phrasing. so please correct it if you think it is
way better.

Thanks,
Liu Yuan