From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mlock: only hold mmap_sem in shared mode when faulting in pages
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:39:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikXx4MgdPYWYNVj8cMOSHTHJEUHqKZ_q-P4jFYp@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinY0pcTcd+OxPLyvsJgHgh=cTaB1-8VbEA2tstb@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2010, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> wrote:
>> Yes, patch 1/6 changes the long hold time to be in read mode instead
>> of write mode, which is only a band-aid. But, this prepares for patch
>> 5/6, which releases mmap_sem whenever there is contention on it or
>> when blocking on disk reads.
>
> I have to say that I'm not a huge fan of that horribly kludgy
> contention check case.
>
> The "move page-in to read-locked sequence" and the changes to
> get_user_pages look fine, but the contention thing is just disgusting.
> I'd really like to see some other approach if at all possible.
Are you OK with the part of patch 5/6 that drops mmap_sem when
blocking on disk ?
This by itself brings mmap_sem hold time down to a few seconds. Plus,
I could add something to limit the interval passed to
__mlock_vma_pages_range to a thousand pages or so, so that the hold
time would then be bounded by that constant.
I think rwsem_is_contended() actually sounds better than fiddling with
constants, but OTOH maybe the mlock use case is not significant enough
to justify introducing that new API.
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-10 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-03 0:16 [PATCH 0/6] mlock: do not hold mmap_sem for extended periods of time Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] mlock: only hold mmap_sem in shared mode when faulting in pages Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-08 23:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-08 23:58 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-10 6:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-10 6:39 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2010-12-10 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-14 0:51 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-14 1:05 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-14 1:26 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-14 15:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-14 23:22 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm: add FOLL_MLOCK follow_page flag Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-04 6:55 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm: move VM_LOCKED check to __mlock_vma_pages_range() Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] rwsem: implement rwsem_is_contended() Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] mlock: do not hold mmap_sem for extended periods of time Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-08 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-03 0:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86 rwsem: more precise rwsem_is_contended() implementation Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 22:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-03 22:51 ` Michel Lespinasse
2010-12-03 23:02 ` [PATCH 0/6] mlock: do not hold mmap_sem for extended periods of time Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikXx4MgdPYWYNVj8cMOSHTHJEUHqKZ_q-P4jFYp@mail.gmail.com \
--to=walken@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox