linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	"M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@superonline.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer_disabled
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:45:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikXfvEVXEyw_5_eJs2v-3J6Xhd=CT9X-0D+GMCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901092430.9741.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

Hi KOSAKI,

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:31 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> M. Vefa Bicakci reported 2.6.35 kernel hang up when hibernation on his
> 32bit 3GB mem machine. (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771)
> Also he was bisected first bad commit is below
>
>  commit bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
>  Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>  Date:   Fri Jun 4 14:15:05 2010 -0700
>
>     vmscan: fix do_try_to_free_pages() return value when priority==0 reclaim failure
>
> At first impression, this seemed very strange because the above commit only
> chenged function return value and hibernate_preallocate_memory() ignore
> return value of shrink_all_memory(). But it's related.
>
> Now, page allocation from hibernation code may enter infinite loop if
> the system has highmem.
>
> The reasons are two. 1) hibernate_preallocate_memory() call
> alloc_pages() wrong order 2) vmscan don't care enough OOM case when
> oom_killer_disabled.
>
> This patch only fix (2). Why is oom_killer_disabled so special?
> because when hibernation case, zone->all_unreclaimable never be turned on

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-01  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-01  0:31 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-01  1:45 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-09-01  1:55   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-01  2:01     ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-01 15:56       ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-02  0:57         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-02  2:55           ` Minchan Kim
2010-09-02  3:05             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-09-02  3:18               ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTikXfvEVXEyw_5_eJs2v-3J6Xhd=CT9X-0D+GMCA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bicave@superonline.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox