From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: Bad page map in process udevd (anon_vma: (null)) in 2.6.38-rc4
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:15:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik8kjt1TZ5vOoAm_y0f7toGtOSpxOsgCXO-bey9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1oc67zcov.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> So I think the change below to fix dev_deactivate which Eric D. missed
> will fix this problem. Now to go test that.
You know what? I think the whole thing is crap. I did a simple grep
for 'unregister_netdevice_many()', and they are all buggy.
Look in net/ipv4/ip_gre.c, net/ipv4/ipip.c,net/ipv4/ipmr.c,
net/ipv6/sit.c, look in net/ipv6/ip6mr.c, just just about anywhere.
Those people *all* do basically a list-head on the stack, and then
they do unregister_netdevice_many() on those things, and they clearly
expect the list to be gone.
I suspect that the right thing to do really is to change the semantics
of those functions that take that kill-list *entirely*. Namely that
they will literall ykill the list too, not just the entries on the
list.
So unregister_netdevice_many() should always return with the list
empty and destroyed. There is no valid use of a list of netdevices
after you've unregistered them.
Now, dev_deactivate_many() actually has uses of that list after
they've been de-activated (__dev_close_many will deactivate them, and
then after that do the whole ndo_stop dance too, so I guess all (two)
callers of that function need to get rid of their list manually. So I
think your patch to sch_generic.c is good, but I really think the
semantics of unregister_netdevice_many() should just be changed.
And I think the networking people need to do some serious code review
of this whole thing. The whole "let's build a list on the stack, then
leave it around, and later use it randomly when the stack head pointer
is long gone" thing is just incredible crapola. We shouldn't be
finding these things one-by-one as a list debugging thing fires.
People need tolook at their code and fix it before the bugs start
triggering.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-20 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 18:52 Michal Hocko
2011-02-16 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 20:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 9:09 ` Michal Hocko
2011-02-17 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 16:26 ` Michal Hocko
2011-02-17 16:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 18:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-17 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 19:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-18 3:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-18 4:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-18 4:36 ` David Miller
2011-02-18 6:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 7:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 8:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: dont leave active on stack LIST_HEAD Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 20:14 ` David Miller
2011-02-18 4:38 ` BUG: Bad page map in process udevd (anon_vma: (null)) in 2.6.38-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2011-02-18 4:40 ` David Miller
2011-02-18 4:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-18 8:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-18 5:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-18 8:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: deinit automatic LIST_HEAD Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 20:14 ` David Miller
2011-02-18 12:29 ` BUG: Bad page map in process udevd (anon_vma: (null)) in 2.6.38-rc4 Michal Hocko
2011-02-18 16:26 ` Michal Hocko
2011-02-18 16:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-18 18:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-18 18:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-18 19:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-18 19:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-18 20:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-19 8:35 ` [PATCH] tcp: fix inet_twsk_deschedule() Eric Dumazet
2011-02-20 2:59 ` David Miller
2011-02-18 19:13 ` BUG: Bad page map in process udevd (anon_vma: (null)) in 2.6.38-rc4 Eric Dumazet
2011-02-18 19:56 ` David Miller
2011-02-19 6:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-19 15:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-20 2:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-20 6:15 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2011-02-20 8:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-20 19:53 ` David Miller
2011-02-20 21:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-18 8:54 ` Michal Hocko
2011-02-20 12:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 16:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-17 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 19:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-17 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-16 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTik8kjt1TZ5vOoAm_y0f7toGtOSpxOsgCXO-bey9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox