From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A43A76B004A for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:18:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so56714iwn.14 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:18:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100902115640.D071.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20100902091206.D053.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100902115640.D071.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:18:27 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer_disabled From: Minchan Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Johannes Weiner , Rik van Riel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "M. Vefa Bicakci" , LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> > I don't want to send risky patch to -stable. >> >> Still I don't want to use oom_killer_disabled magic. >> But I don't want to prevent urgent stable patch due to my just nitpick. >> >> This is my last try(just quick patch, even I didn't tried compile test). > > Looks like conceptually correct. If you will test it and fix whitespace damage, > I'll ack this one gladly. > > Thanks. > I will resend formal patch ASAP. Maybe tonight after out of office. Thanks for quick reply. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org