RE: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline

[William Roberts <WRoberts@tresys.com>]

I sent out 3 patches on 12/2/2013. I didn't get any response. I thought I added the right people based on get_maintainers script.

Can anyone comment on these or point me in the right direction?

RGB, Can you at least ACK the audit subsystem patch " audit: Audit proc cmdline value"?

Thank you,
Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On Behalf Of William Roberts
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:11 PM
To: linux-audit@redhat.com; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; rgb@redhat.com; viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline

This patch series relates to work started on the audit mailing list.
It eventually involved touching other modules, so I am trying to pull in those owners as well. In a nutshell I add new utility functions for accessing a processes cmdline value as displayed in proc/<self>/cmdline, and then refactor procfs to use the utility functions, and then add the ability to the audit subsystem to record this value.

Thanks for any feedback and help.

[PATCH 1/3] mm: Create utility functions for accessing a tasks
[PATCH 2/3] proc: Update get proc_pid_cmdline() to use mm.h helpers
[PATCH 3/3] audit: Audit proc cmdline value

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>