From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A4886B0087 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 20:35:30 -0500 (EST) From: "Zheng, Shaohui" Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:35:08 +0800 Subject: RE: [5/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64 Message-ID: References: <20101207010033.280301752@intel.com> <20101207010140.092555703@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes , Tejun Heo Cc: Andrew Morton , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "haicheng.li@linux.intel.com" , "lethal@linux-sh.org" , Andi Kleen , "dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "Brown, Len" , Yinghai Lu , "Li, Haicheng" , Shaohui Zheng List-ID: Both Tejun's and my patches are under review process, the hotplug emulator = patchset is much earlier than Tejun's patch. Currently, I did not know how = to handle this situation. It seems that I have 3 options: 1) continue to send this patchset based on current upstream kernel =20 2) continue to send this patchset based on upstream kernel + Tejun's patch 3) Postpone the patchset until Tejun's patches are accepted. Can someone provide some suggestions? Thanks so much. Thanks & Regards, Shaohui -----Original Message----- From: David Rientjes [mailto:rientjes@google.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 5:37 AM To: Zheng, Shaohui; Tejun Heo Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; haiche= ng.li@linux.intel.com; lethal@linux-sh.org; Andi Kleen; dave@linux.vnet.ibm= .com; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Ingo Molnar; Brown, Len; Yinghai Lu; Li, Haicheng Subject: Re: [5/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x= 86_64 On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, shaohui.zheng@intel.com wrote: > From: Shaohui Zheng >=20 This patch is undoubtedly going to conflict with Tejun's unification of=20 the 32 and 64 bit NUMA boot paths, specifically the patch at=20 http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D129087151912379. Tejun, what's the status of that patchset posted on November 27? Any=20 comments about this change? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org