linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Igor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov@omprussia.ru>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/memcontrol: return 1 from cgroup.memory __setup() handler
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:53:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f8d4ddb-81ce-738a-d1f7-346ff9bf8ebd@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220302185300.GA19699@blackbody.suse.cz>



On 3/2/22 10:53, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 04:58:11PM -0800, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>> __setup() handlers should return 1 if the command line option is handled
>> and 0 if not (or maybe never return 0; it just pollutes init's environment).
> 
> Interesting.
> 
>> Instead of relying on this '.' quirk, just return 1 to indicate that
>> the boot option has been handled.
> 
> But your patch would return 1 even when no accepted value was passed,
> i.e. is the command line option considered handled in that case?

Yes, for some definition of "handled."  It was seen by the __setup handler.

> Did you want to return 1 only when the cgroup.memory= value is
> recognized?

Not really. I did consider that (for all of the similar patches that I am
posting).

I don't think those strings (even with invalid option values) should be
added to init's environment.

I'm willing to add a pr_warn() or pr_notice() for any unrecognized
option value, but it should still return 1 IMO.

-- 
~Randy


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-03  0:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-22  0:58 Randy Dunlap
2022-03-02 18:53 ` Michal Koutný
2022-03-03  0:53   ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2022-03-03 10:14     ` Michal Koutný
2022-03-03 21:53       ` Randy Dunlap
2022-03-03 22:32         ` Michal Koutný
2022-03-03 22:53           ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f8d4ddb-81ce-738a-d1f7-346ff9bf8ebd@infradead.org \
    --to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=i.zhbanov@omprussia.ru \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox