From: "Huang, Shaoqin" <shaoqin.huang@intel.com>
To: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_trim_memory
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:46:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f6a0b68-6777-dd88-929c-2d4303b28984@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ebbd1fd2c2a3d223a744adf24b4293a559a7003a.1660454730.git.remckee0@gmail.com>
On 8/14/2022 1:54 PM, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> Add tests for memblock_trim_memory() for the following scenarios:
> - all regions aligned
> - one region unalign that is smaller than the alignment
> - one region unaligned at the base
> - one region unaligned at the end
>
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 223 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 223 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
> index d7f008e7a12a..c8bb44f20846 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #define FUNC_RESERVE "memblock_reserve"
> #define FUNC_REMOVE "memblock_remove"
> #define FUNC_FREE "memblock_free"
> +#define FUNC_TRIM "memblock_trim_memory"
>
> static int memblock_initialization_check(void)
> {
> @@ -1723,6 +1724,227 @@ static int memblock_bottom_up_checks(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * A test that tries to trim memory when both ends of the memory region are
> + * aligned. Expect that the memory will not be trimmed. Expect the counter to
> + * not be updated.
> + */
> +static int memblock_trim_memory_aligned_check(void)
> +{
> + struct memblock_region *rgn;
> + phys_addr_t alignment = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> +
> + rgn = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
> +
> + struct region r = {
> + .base = alignment,
> + .size = alignment * 4
> + };
> +
> + PREFIX_PUSH();
> +
> + reset_memblock_regions();
> + memblock_add(r.base, r.size);
> + memblock_trim_memory(alignment);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r.base);
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, r.size);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1);
> +
> + test_pass_pop();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * A test that tries to trim memory when there are two available regions, r1 and
> + * r2. Region r1 is aligned on both ends and region r2 is unaligned on one end
> + * and smaller than the alignment:
> + *
> + * alignment
> + * |--------|
> + * | +-----------------+ +------+ |
> + * | | r1 | | r2 | |
> + * +--------+-----------------+--------+------+---+
> + * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> + * |________|________|________| |
> + * | Unaligned address
> + * Aligned addresses
> + *
> + * Expect that r1 will not be trimmed and r2 will be removed. Expect the
> + * counter to be updated.
> + */
> +static int memblock_trim_memory_too_small_check(void)
> +{
> + struct memblock_region *rgn;
> + phys_addr_t alignment = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> +
> + rgn = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
> +
> + struct region r1 = {
> + .base = alignment,
> + .size = alignment * 2
> + };
> + struct region r2 = {
> + .base = alignment * 4,
> + .size = alignment - SZ_2
> + };
> +
> + PREFIX_PUSH();
> +
> + reset_memblock_regions();
> + memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size);
> + memblock_add(r2.base, r2.size);
> + memblock_trim_memory(alignment);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn->base, r1.base);
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn->size, r1.size);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 1);
> +
> + test_pass_pop();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * A test that tries to trim memory when there are two available regions, r1 and
> + * r2. Region r1 is aligned on both ends and region r2 is unaligned at the base
> + * and aligned at the end:
> + *
> + * Unaligned address
> + * |
> + * v
> + * | +-----------------+ +---------------+ |
> + * | | r1 | | r2 | |
> + * +--------+-----------------+----------+---------------+---+
> + * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> + * |________|________|________|________|________|
> + * |
> + * Aligned addresses
> + *
> + * Expect that r1 will not be trimmed and r2 will be trimmed at the base.
> + * Expect the counter to not be updated.
> + */
> +static int memblock_trim_memory_unaligned_base_check(void)
> +{
> + struct memblock_region *rgn1, *rgn2;
> + phys_addr_t alignment = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> + phys_addr_t offset = SZ_2;
> + phys_addr_t r2_base, r2_size;
> +
> + rgn1 = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
> + rgn2 = &memblock.memory.regions[1];
> +
> + struct region r1 = {
> + .base = alignment,
> + .size = alignment * 2
> + };
> + struct region r2 = {
> + .base = alignment * 4 + offset,
> + .size = alignment * 2 - offset
> + };
> +
> + PREFIX_PUSH();
> +
> + r2_base = r2.base + (alignment - offset);
> + r2_size = r2.size - (alignment - offset);
Also the variable name.
> +
> + reset_memblock_regions();
> + memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size);
> + memblock_add(r2.base, r2.size);
> + memblock_trim_memory(alignment);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->base, r1.base);
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->size, r1.size);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->base, r2_base);
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->size, r2_size);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 2);
> +
> + test_pass_pop();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * A test that tries to trim memory when there are two available regions, r1 and
> + * r2. Region r1 is aligned on both ends and region r2 is aligned at the base
> + * and unaligned at the end:
> + *
> + * Unaligned address
> + * |
> + * v
> + * | +-----------------+ +---------------+ |
> + * | | r1 | | r2 | |
> + * +--------+-----------------+--------+---------------+---+
> + * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> + * |________|________|________|________|________|
> + * |
> + * Aligned addresses
> + *
> + * Expect that r1 will not be trimmed and r2 will be trimmed at the base.
^
at the end.
> + * Expect the counter to not be updated.
> + */
> +static int memblock_trim_memory_unaligned_end_check(void)
> +{
> + struct memblock_region *rgn1, *rgn2;
> + phys_addr_t alignment = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> + phys_addr_t offset = SZ_2;
> + phys_addr_t r2_size;
> +
> + rgn1 = &memblock.memory.regions[0];
> + rgn2 = &memblock.memory.regions[1];
> +
> + struct region r1 = {
> + .base = alignment,
> + .size = alignment * 2
> + };
> + struct region r2 = {
> + .base = alignment * 4,
> + .size = alignment * 2 - offset
> + };
> +
> + PREFIX_PUSH();
> +
> + r2_size = r2.size - (alignment - offset);
> +
> + reset_memblock_regions();
> + memblock_add(r1.base, r1.size);
> + memblock_add(r2.base, r2.size);
> + memblock_trim_memory(alignment);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->base, r1.base);
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn1->size, r1.size);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->base, r2.base);
> + ASSERT_EQ(rgn2->size, r2_size);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(memblock.memory.cnt, 2);
> +
> + test_pass_pop();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int memblock_trim_memory_checks(void)
> +{
> + prefix_reset();
> + prefix_push(FUNC_TRIM);
> + test_print("Running %s tests...\n", FUNC_TRIM);
> +
> + memblock_trim_memory_aligned_check();
> + memblock_trim_memory_too_small_check();
> + memblock_trim_memory_unaligned_base_check();
> + memblock_trim_memory_unaligned_end_check();
> +
> + prefix_pop();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int memblock_basic_checks(void)
> {
> memblock_initialization_check();
> @@ -1731,6 +1953,7 @@ int memblock_basic_checks(void)
> memblock_remove_checks();
> memblock_free_checks();
> memblock_bottom_up_checks();
> + memblock_trim_memory_checks();
>
> return 0;
> }
Others looks good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-14 5:53 [PATCH 0/8] memblock tests: update and extend memblock simulator Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-14 5:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] memblock tests: update tests to check if memblock_alloc zeroed memory Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-15 8:50 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-16 2:15 ` Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-16 2:24 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-14 5:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] memblock tests: update zeroed memory check for memblock_alloc_* tests Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-15 8:59 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-14 5:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] memblock tests: add labels to verbose output for generic alloc tests Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-15 9:15 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-16 2:39 ` Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-16 3:08 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-19 5:03 ` Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-19 8:39 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-14 5:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] memblock tests: add additional tests for basic api and memblock_alloc Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-15 10:19 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-14 5:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] memblock tests: update alloc_api to test memblock_alloc_raw Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-14 5:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] memblock tests: update alloc_nid_api to test memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-16 1:24 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-14 5:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_*bottom_up functions Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-16 1:46 ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-08-14 5:54 ` [PATCH 8/8] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_trim_memory Rebecca Mckeever
2022-08-16 1:46 ` Huang, Shaoqin [this message]
2022-08-20 8:40 ` Rebecca Mckeever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f6a0b68-6777-dd88-929c-2d4303b28984@intel.com \
--to=shaoqin.huang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=remckee0@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox