linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>, "Lance Yang" <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	josef@toxicpanda.com, tj@kernel.org,
	fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	a.hindborg@samsung.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it,
	axboe@kernel.dk, vbabka@kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
	21cnbao@gmail.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	libang.li@antgroup.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] cgroupv2/blk: inconsistent I/O behavior in Cgroup v2 with set device wbps and wiops
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:37:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ede36af-fca4-ed41-6b7e-cef157c640bb@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <zjbn575huc6pk7jpv2ipoayfk4bvfu5z5imb5muk5drksa7p3q@xcr5imtt4zro>

Hi,

在 2024/08/12 23:43, Michal Koutný 写道:
> +Cc Kuai
> 
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 11:00:30PM GMT, Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've run into a problem with Cgroup v2 where it doesn't seem to correctly limit
>> I/O operations when I set both wbps and wiops for a device. However, if I only
>> set wbps, then everything works as expected.
>>
>> To reproduce the problem, we can follow these command-based steps:
>>
>> 1. **System Information:**
>>     - Kernel Version and OS Release:
>>       ```
>>       $ uname -r
>>       6.10.0-rc5+
>>
>>       $ cat /etc/os-release
>>       PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 24.04 LTS"
>>       NAME="Ubuntu"
>>       VERSION_ID="24.04"
>>       VERSION="24.04 LTS (Noble Numbat)"
>>       VERSION_CODENAME=noble
>>       ID=ubuntu
>>       ID_LIKE=debian
>>       HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/"
>>       SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/"
>>       BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/"
>>       PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy"
>>       UBUNTU_CODENAME=noble
>>       LOGO=ubuntu-logo
>>       ```
>>
>> 2. **Device Information and Settings:**
>>     - List Block Devices and Scheduler:
>>       ```
>>       $ lsblk
>>       NAME    MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
>>       sda     8:0    0   4.4T  0 disk
>>       └─sda1  8:1    0   4.4T  0 part /data
>>       ...
>>
>>       $ cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
>>       none [mq-deadline] kyber bfq
>>
>>       $ cat /sys/block/sda/queue/rotational
>>       1
>>       ```
>>
>> 3. **Reproducing the problem:**
>>     - Navigate to the cgroup v2 filesystem and configure I/O settings:
>>       ```
>>       $ cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
>>       $ stat -fc %T /sys/fs/cgroup
>>       cgroup2fs
>>       $ mkdir test
>>       $ echo "8:0 wbps=10485760 wiops=100000" > io.max
>>       ```
>>       In this setup:
>>       wbps=10485760 sets the write bytes per second limit to 10 MB/s.
>>       wiops=100000 sets the write I/O operations per second limit to 100,000.
>>
>>     - Add process to the cgroup and verify:
>>       ```
>>       $ echo $$ > cgroup.procs
>>       $ cat cgroup.procs
>>       3826771
>>       3828513
>>       $ ps -ef|grep 3826771
>>       root     3826771 3826768  0 22:04 pts/1    00:00:00 -bash
>>       root     3828761 3826771  0 22:06 pts/1    00:00:00 ps -ef
>>       root     3828762 3826771  0 22:06 pts/1    00:00:00 grep --color=auto 3826771
>>       ```
>>
>>     - Observe I/O performance using `dd` commands and `iostat`:
>>       ```
>>       $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/file1 bs=512M count=1 &
>>       $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/file1 bs=512M count=1 &

You're testing buffer IO here, and I don't see that write back cgroup is
enabled. Is this test intentional? Why not test direct IO?
>>       ```
>>       ```
>>       $ iostat -d 1 -h -y -p sda
>>       
>> 	   tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>       7.00         0.0k         1.3M         0.0k       0.0k       1.3M       0.0k sda
>>       7.00         0.0k         1.3M         0.0k       0.0k       1.3M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>       5.00         0.0k         1.2M         0.0k       0.0k       1.2M       0.0k sda
>>       5.00         0.0k         1.2M         0.0k       0.0k       1.2M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>      21.00         0.0k         1.4M         0.0k       0.0k       1.4M       0.0k sda
>>      21.00         0.0k         1.4M         0.0k       0.0k       1.4M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>       5.00         0.0k         1.2M         0.0k       0.0k       1.2M       0.0k sda
>>       5.00         0.0k         1.2M         0.0k       0.0k       1.2M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>       5.00         0.0k         1.2M         0.0k       0.0k       1.2M       0.0k sda
>>       5.00         0.0k         1.2M         0.0k       0.0k       1.2M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>    1848.00         0.0k       448.1M         0.0k       0.0k     448.1M       0.0k sda
>>    1848.00         0.0k       448.1M         0.0k       0.0k     448.1M       0.0k sda1

Looks like all dirty buffer got flushed to disk at the last second while
the file is closed, this is expected.
>>       ```
>> Initially, the write speed is slow (<2MB/s) then suddenly bursts to several
>> hundreds of MB/s.
> 
> What it would be on average?
> IOW how long would the whole operation in throttled cgroup take?
> 
>>
>>     - Testing with wiops set to max:
>>       ```
>>       echo "8:0 wbps=10485760 wiops=max" > io.max
>>       $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/file1 bs=512M count=1 &
>>       $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/data/file1 bs=512M count=1 &
>>       ```
>>       ```
>>       $ iostat -d 1 -h -y -p sda
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>      48.00         0.0k        10.0M         0.0k       0.0k      10.0M       0.0k sda
>>      48.00         0.0k        10.0M         0.0k       0.0k      10.0M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>      40.00         0.0k        10.0M         0.0k       0.0k      10.0M       0.0k sda
>>      40.00         0.0k        10.0M         0.0k       0.0k      10.0M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>      41.00         0.0k        10.0M         0.0k       0.0k      10.0M       0.0k sda
>>      41.00         0.0k        10.0M         0.0k       0.0k      10.0M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>      46.00         0.0k        10.0M         0.0k       0.0k      10.0M       0.0k sda
>>      46.00         0.0k        10.0M         0.0k       0.0k      10.0M       0.0k sda1
>>
>>
>>        tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_dscd/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn    kB_dscd Device
>>      55.00         0.0k        10.2M         0.0k       0.0k      10.2M       0.0k sda
>>      55.00         0.0k        10.2M         0.0k       0.0k      10.2M       0.0k sda1

And I don't this wiops=max is the reason, what need to explain is that
why dirty buffer got flushed to disk synchronously before the dd finish
and close the file?

>>       ```
>> The iostat output shows the write operations as stabilizing at around 10 MB/s,
>> which aligns with the defined limit of 10 MB/s. After setting wiops to max, the
>> I/O limits appear to work as expected.

Can you give the direct IO a test? And also enable write back cgroup for
buffer IO.

Thanks,
Kuai

>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lance
> 
> Thanks for the report Lance. Is this something you started seeing after
> a kernel update or switch to cgroup v2? (Or you simply noticed with this
> setup only?)
> 
> 
> Michal
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-13  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12 15:00 Lance Yang
2024-08-12 15:43 ` Michal Koutný
2024-08-13  1:37   ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2024-08-13  5:00     ` Lance Yang
2024-08-13  6:17       ` Lance Yang
2024-08-13  6:39       ` Yu Kuai
2024-08-13  7:19         ` Yu Kuai
2024-08-15  1:59           ` Lance Yang
2024-08-23 12:05           ` Lance Yang
2024-08-26  1:31             ` Yu Kuai
2024-08-26  2:15               ` Lance Yang
2024-08-23 12:19           ` Lance Yang
2024-08-13  5:11   ` Lance Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ede36af-fca4-ed41-6b7e-cef157c640bb@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox