linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel LKML <mel.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Sven Geggus <lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de>,
	Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mohamed Abbas <mohamed.abbas@intel.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:46:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ec2d7290910240646p75b93c68v6ea1648d628a9660@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091023211239.GA6185@bizet.domek.prywatny>

Hi,

This is the same Mel as mel@csn.ul.ie. The mail server the address is
on has no power until Tuesday so I'm not going to be very unresponsive
until then. Monday is also a public holiday here and apparently they
are upgrading the power transformers near the building.

On 10/23/09, Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 06:58:10PM +0200, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:22:31PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> > Test 3: If you are getting allocation failures, try with the following
>> > patch
>> >
>> >   3/5 vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order
>> > watermarks are being hit
>
>> No, problem doesn't go away with these patches (1+2+3).  However, from
>> my testing this particular patch makes it way, way harder to trigger
>> allocation failures (but these are still present).
>>
>> This bothers me - should I test following patches with or without
>> above patch?  This patch makes bug harder to find, IMVHO it doesn't
>> fix the real problem.
> ..
>
>> Test 4: If you are still getting failures, apply the following
>>  4/5 page allocator: Pre-emptively wake kswapd when high-order watermarks
>> are hit
>
> Ok, I've tested patches 1+2+4 and bug, while very hard to trigger, is
> still present. I'll test complete 1-4 patchset as time permits.
>

And also patch 5 please which is the revert. Patch 5 as pointed out is
probably a red herring. Hwoever, it has changed the timing and made a
difference for some testing so I'd like to know if it helps yours as
well.

As things stand, it looks like patches 1+2 should certainly go ahead.
I need to give more thought on patches 3 and 4 as to why they help
Tobias but not anyone elses testing.

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-24 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-22 14:22 Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] page allocator: Always wake kswapd when restarting an allocation attempt after direct reclaim failed Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:24   ` [PATCH 1/5 Against 2.6.31.4] " Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:41   ` [PATCH 1/5] " Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 15:49     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26  1:11   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-26  7:10     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27  2:42       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-27 12:27         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use ALLOC_HARDER Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 16:33   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-22 16:37     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23  9:57       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-24  2:03       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-27 15:19         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-25 12:57       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-10-26  1:15   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] vmscan: Force kswapd to take notice faster when high-order watermarks are being hit Mel Gorman
2009-10-23 17:52   ` Vincent Li
2009-10-23 22:12     ` Vincent Li
2009-10-27 10:38     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] page allocator: Pre-emptively wake kswapd when high-order watermarks are hit Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 19:41   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-23  9:13     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23  9:36       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-23 11:25         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-23 11:31           ` Tobias Oetiker
2009-10-23 13:39             ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-27 15:26     ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ONLY-APPLY-IF-STILL-FAILING Revert 373c0a7e, 8aa7e847: Fix congestion_wait() sync/async vs read/write confusion Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 14:25   ` Against 2.6.31.4 [PATCH 5/5] " Mel Gorman
2009-10-22 21:49   ` [PATCH 5/5] ONLY-APPLY-IF-STILL-FAILING " Jens Axboe
2009-10-27  2:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-10-27 10:29     ` Frans Pop
2009-10-22 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2 Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 16:03   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-24  1:52   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-24  6:48     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-24  6:48     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-22 15:43 ` reinette chatre
2009-10-27 10:40   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-27 23:34     ` reinette chatre
2009-10-23  7:31 ` Sven Geggus
2009-10-23 16:58 ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-23 21:12   ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-24 13:46     ` Mel LKML [this message]
2009-10-28 11:42       ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-28 11:59         ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-30 14:23           ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-11-02 20:30             ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-04  2:03               ` Karol Lewandowski
2009-10-28 12:55         ` Tobi Oetiker
2009-10-24 13:51 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-24 14:02 ` Sven Geggus
2009-10-27 13:27   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26 17:37 ` Tobias Oetiker
2009-10-27 15:36   ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-26 22:17 ` Frans Pop
2009-10-26 23:45   ` Frans Pop
2009-11-06  6:03 ` Tobias Diedrich
2009-11-06  9:24   ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-06  9:24   ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-06 11:15     ` Tobias Diedrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ec2d7290910240646p75b93c68v6ea1648d628a9660@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mel.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kalle.valo@iki.fi \
    --cc=karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mohamed.abbas@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=tobi@oetiker.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox