From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>, <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
<muchun.song@linux.dev>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: pagewalk: assert write mmap lock only for walking the user page tables
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 19:09:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e5c199a-9b4d-4d1b-97d4-dd2b776ac85f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231127084645.27017-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
On 2023/11/27 16:46, Muchun Song wrote:
> The 8782fb61cc848 ("mm: pagewalk: Fix race between unmap and page walker")
> introduces an assertion to walk_page_range_novma() to make all the users
> of page table walker is safe. However, the race only exists for walking the
> user page tables. And it is ridiculous to hold a particular user mmap write
> lock against the changes of the kernel page tables. So only assert at least
> mmap read lock when walking the kernel page tables. And some users matching
> this case could downgrade to a mmap read lock to relief the contention of
> mmap lock of init_mm, it will be nicer in hugetlb (only holding mmap read
> lock) in the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> ---
> mm/pagewalk.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
> index b7d7e4fcfad7a..f46c80b18ce4f 100644
> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
> @@ -539,6 +539,11 @@ int walk_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> * not backed by VMAs. Because 'unusual' entries may be walked this function
> * will also not lock the PTEs for the pte_entry() callback. This is useful for
> * walking the kernel pages tables or page tables for firmware.
> + *
> + * Note: Be careful to walk the kernel pages tables, the caller may be need to
> + * take other effective approache (mmap lock may be insufficient) to prevent
> + * the intermediate kernel page tables belonging to the specified address range
> + * from being freed (e.g. memory hot-remove).
> */
> int walk_page_range_novma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> unsigned long end, const struct mm_walk_ops *ops,
> @@ -556,7 +561,29 @@ int walk_page_range_novma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> if (start >= end || !walk.mm)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mmap_assert_write_locked(walk.mm);
> + /*
> + * 1) For walking the user virtual address space:
> + *
> + * The mmap lock protects the page walker from changes to the page
> + * tables during the walk. However a read lock is insufficient to
> + * protect those areas which don't have a VMA as munmap() detaches
> + * the VMAs before downgrading to a read lock and actually tearing
> + * down PTEs/page tables. In which case, the mmap write lock should
> + * be hold.
> + *
> + * 2) For walking the kernel virtual address space:
> + *
> + * The kernel intermediate page tables usually do not be freed, so
> + * the mmap map read lock is sufficient. But there are some exceptions.
> + * E.g. memory hot-remove. In which case, the mmap lock is insufficient
> + * to prevent the intermediate kernel pages tables belonging to the
> + * specified address range from being freed. The caller should take
> + * other actions to prevent this race.
> + */
> + if (mm == &init_mm)
> + mmap_assert_locked(walk.mm);
> + else
> + mmap_assert_write_locked(walk.mm);
Maybe just use process_mm_walk_lock() and set correct page_walk_lock in
struct mm_walk_ops?
>
> return walk_pgd_range(start, end, &walk);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 8:46 [PATCH 0/4] Code simplification and clean-up for hugetlb vmemmap Muchun Song
2023-11-27 8:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: pagewalk: assert write mmap lock only for walking the user page tables Muchun Song
2023-12-01 11:09 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2023-12-02 8:08 ` Muchun Song
2023-12-02 9:25 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-12-02 9:47 ` Muchun Song
2023-12-04 21:39 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-11-27 8:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: use walk_page_range_novma() to simplify the code Muchun Song
2023-12-04 22:53 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-11-27 8:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: move PageVmemmapSelfHosted() check to split_vmemmap_huge_pmd() Muchun Song
2023-12-04 23:27 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-12-05 2:46 ` Muchun Song
2023-11-27 8:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: convert page to folio Muchun Song
2023-12-05 0:15 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e5c199a-9b4d-4d1b-97d4-dd2b776ac85f@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox