From: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm/gup: folio_split_user_page_pin
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 13:20:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dc54dbf-18b3-43f9-af4f-39ce44406ebe@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <210cb725-fdc5-4878-9e6b-4357d34afb9f@redhat.com>
On 10/4/2024 6:04 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.10.24 19:17, Steven Sistare wrote:
>> On 9/27/2024 11:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 05:44:52PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> /**
>>>> * folio_try_add_pins() - add pins to an already-pinned folio
>>>> * @folio: the folio to add more pins to
>>>> *
>>>> * Try to add more pins to an already-pinned folio. The semantics
>>>> * of the pin (e.g., FOLL_WRITE) follow any existing pin and cannot
>>>> * be changed.
>>>> *
>>>> * This function is helpful when having obtained a pin on a large folio
>>>> * using memfd_pin_folios(), but wanting to logically unpin parts
>>>> * (e.g., individual pages) of the folio later, for example, using
>>>> * unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock().
>>>> *
>>>> * This is not the right interface to initially pin a folio.
>>>> */
>>>> int folio_try_add_pins(struct folio *folio, unsigned int pins)
>>>> {
>>>> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio));
>>>>
>>>> return try_grab_folio(folio, pins, FOLL_PIN);
>>>> }
>>>
>>> That looks pretty good to me too
>>
>> Looks good and passes my tests, I will add this version in V3 of the patch series.
>>
>> Are you sure you want "try" in the name folio_try_add_pins? Usually try means
>> that any failure is transient and a future call may succeed
>
> And now I took another look at the codebase and we already do have folio_add_pin() that adds a single pin, but continues on overflows (not sure I like that, but at least it can be caught and debugged).
>
> So yes, we could simply turn folio_add_pin() into a wrapper around a folio_add_pins() that adds multiple pins.
> Looking at folio_add_pin() vs. try_grab_folio() I am not sure if the open-coding the logic in folio_add_pin() got the NR_FOLL_PIN_ACQUIRED accounting correct.
To be clear, I am only suggesting that I use your folio_try_add_pins implementation, but
rename it to folio_add_pins. And not touch the existing folio_add_pin.
I am ready to send V3 of the iommu_ioas_map_file series, and I would like to add this
patch back to the series as Jason requested.
- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-24 15:05 Steve Sistare
2024-09-24 16:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-27 15:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-27 15:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-01 17:17 ` Steven Sistare
2024-10-04 10:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-04 17:20 ` Steven Sistare [this message]
2024-10-04 20:19 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9dc54dbf-18b3-43f9-af4f-39ce44406ebe@oracle.com \
--to=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox