linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@hpe.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, vpk@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:18:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c558dfc-112a-bb52-88c5-206f5ca4fc42@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKvWZ6=YLkFkA2wEE0gTdESTEifeL5KVXUd+EjKjJm9WQ@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2873 bytes --]

On 11/10/2016 08:24 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@hpe.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds support for XPFO which protects against 'ret2dir' kernel
>> attacks. The basic idea is to enforce exclusive ownership of page frames
>> by either the kernel or userspace, unless explicitly requested by the
>> kernel. Whenever a page destined for userspace is allocated, it is
>> unmapped from physmap (the kernel's page table). When such a page is
>> reclaimed from userspace, it is mapped back to physmap.
>>
>> Additional fields in the page_ext struct are used for XPFO housekeeping.
>> Specifically two flags to distinguish user vs. kernel pages and to tag
>> unmapped pages and a reference counter to balance kmap/kunmap operations
>> and a lock to serialize access to the XPFO fields.
>>
>> Known issues/limitations:
>>   - Only supports x86-64 (for now)
>>   - Only supports 4k pages (for now)
>>   - There are most likely some legitimate uses cases where the kernel needs
>>     to access userspace which need to be made XPFO-aware
>>   - Performance penalty
>>
>> Reference paper by the original patch authors:
>>   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~vpk/papers/ret2dir.sec14.pdf
> 
> Would it be possible to create an lkdtm test that can exercise this protection?

I'll look into it.


>> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
>> index 118f4549404e..4502e15c8419 100644
>> --- a/security/Kconfig
>> +++ b/security/Kconfig
>> @@ -6,6 +6,25 @@ menu "Security options"
>>
>>  source security/keys/Kconfig
>>
>> +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_XPFO
>> +       bool
> 
> Can you include a "help" section here to describe what requirements an
> architecture needs to support XPFO? See HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER and
> HAVE_ARCH_VMAP_STACK or some examples.

Will do.


>> +config XPFO
>> +       bool "Enable eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO)"
>> +       default n
>> +       depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_XPFO
>> +       select PAGE_EXTENSION
>> +       help
>> +         This option offers protection against 'ret2dir' kernel attacks.
>> +         When enabled, every time a page frame is allocated to user space, it
>> +         is unmapped from the direct mapped RAM region in kernel space
>> +         (physmap). Similarly, when a page frame is freed/reclaimed, it is
>> +         mapped back to physmap.
>> +
>> +         There is a slight performance impact when this option is enabled.
>> +
>> +         If in doubt, say "N".
>> +
>>  config SECURITY_DMESG_RESTRICT
>>         bool "Restrict unprivileged access to the kernel syslog"
>>         default n
> 
> I've added these patches to my kspp tree on kernel.org, so it should
> get some 0-day testing now...

Very good. Thanks!


> Thanks!

Appreciate the feedback.

...Juerg


> -Kees
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-15 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-26 14:21 [RFC PATCH] " Juerg Haefliger
2016-03-01  1:31 ` Laura Abbott
2016-03-21  8:37   ` Juerg Haefliger
2016-03-28 19:29     ` Laura Abbott
2016-03-01  2:10 ` Balbir Singh
2016-03-21  8:44   ` Juerg Haefliger
2016-04-01  0:21     ` Balbir Singh
2016-09-02 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] " Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-02 11:39   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] " Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-02 11:39   ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] xpfo: Only put previous userspace pages into the hot cache Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-02 20:39     ` Dave Hansen
2016-09-05 11:54       ` Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-02 11:39   ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] block: Always use a bounce buffer when XPFO is enabled Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-14  7:18   ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO) Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-14  7:18     ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] " Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-14  7:19     ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] xpfo: Only put previous userspace pages into the hot cache Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-14 14:33       ` [kernel-hardening] " Dave Hansen
2016-09-14 14:40         ` Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-14 14:48           ` Dave Hansen
2016-09-21  5:32             ` Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-14  7:19     ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] block: Always use a bounce buffer when XPFO is enabled Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-14  7:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-14  7:23     ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO) Juerg Haefliger
2016-09-14  9:36     ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-14  9:49       ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-04 14:45     ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] " Juerg Haefliger
2016-11-04 14:45       ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] " Juerg Haefliger
2016-11-04 14:50         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-10  5:53         ` [kernel-hardening] " ZhaoJunmin Zhao(Junmin)
2016-11-10 19:11         ` Kees Cook
2016-11-15 11:15           ` Juerg Haefliger
2016-11-10 19:24         ` Kees Cook
2016-11-15 11:18           ` Juerg Haefliger [this message]
2016-11-24 10:56         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-11-28 11:15           ` Juerg Haefliger
2016-12-09  9:02           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-11-04 14:45       ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] xpfo: Only put previous userspace pages into the hot cache Juerg Haefliger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c558dfc-112a-bb52-88c5-206f5ca4fc42@hpe.com \
    --to=juerg.haefliger@hpe.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vpk@cs.columbia.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox