From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_io: fix PSWPIN undercount for large folios in sio_read_complete()
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:37:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c0ae600-d73b-4e7b-90ec-4f858c665d80@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323231315.240137-1-devnexen@gmail.com>
Hi,
please don't send patches a reply to other patches.
On 3/24/26 00:13, David Carlier wrote:
> sio_read_complete() uses sio->pages to account global PSWPIN vm events,
> but sio->pages tracks the number of bvec entries (folios), not base
> pages.
> For large folios this undercounts compared to the per-memcg path
> which correctly uses folio_nr_pages(), and compared to the bdev read
> paths which also use folio_nr_pages().
>
> Use sio->len >> PAGE_SHIFT instead, which gives the correct base page
> count since sio->len is accumulated via folio_size(folio).
>
> Fixes: 6a8c068774ad ("mm/page_io: use a folio in sio_read_complete()")
Is that commit really to blame? I don't see how that one would cause it.
It would rather be the code that actually made more than one page be
represented in a single entry.
Is maybe a1a0dfd56f97 ("mm: handle THP in swap_*page_fs()") to blame?
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/page_io.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
> index 63b262f4c5a9..1389cd57ca88 100644
> --- a/mm/page_io.c
> +++ b/mm/page_io.c
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static void sio_read_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long ret)
> folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> folio_unlock(folio);
> }
> - count_vm_events(PSWPIN, sio->pages);
> + count_vm_events(PSWPIN, sio->len >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> } else {
> for (p = 0; p < sio->pages; p++) {
> struct folio *folio = page_folio(sio->bvec[p].bv_page);
--
Cheers,
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 17:04 [PATCH] mm/page_io: use folios in sio_write_complete() David Carlier
2026-03-23 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-23 23:07 ` David CARLIER
2026-03-23 23:13 ` [PATCH] mm/page_io: fix PSWPIN undercount for large folios in sio_read_complete() David Carlier
2026-03-30 6:37 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c0ae600-d73b-4e7b-90ec-4f858c665d80@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox