linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 1/4] mm: add MAP_DROPPABLE for designating always lazily freeable mappings
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 06:05:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b400450-46bc-41c7-9e89-825993851101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <378f23cb-362e-413a-b221-09a5352e79f2@redhat.com>

On 10.07.24 05:27, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.07.24 15:05, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> The vDSO getrandom() implementation works with a buffer allocated with a
>> new system call that has certain requirements:
>>
>> - It shouldn't be written to core dumps.
>>     * Easy: VM_DONTDUMP.
>> - It should be zeroed on fork.
>>     * Easy: VM_WIPEONFORK.
>>
>> - It shouldn't be written to swap.
>>     * Uh-oh: mlock is rlimited.
>>     * Uh-oh: mlock isn't inherited by forks.
>>
>> It turns out that the vDSO getrandom() function has three really nice
>> characteristics that we can exploit to solve this problem:
>>
>> 1) Due to being wiped during fork(), the vDSO code is already robust to
>>      having the contents of the pages it reads zeroed out midway through
>>      the function's execution.
>>
>> 2) In the absolute worst case of whatever contingency we're coding for,
>>      we have the option to fallback to the getrandom() syscall, and
>>      everything is fine.
>>
>> 3) The buffers the function uses are only ever useful for a maximum of
>>      60 seconds -- a sort of cache, rather than a long term allocation.
>>
>> These characteristics mean that we can introduce VM_DROPPABLE, which
>> has the following semantics:
>>
>> a) It never is written out to swap.
>> b) Under memory pressure, mm can just drop the pages (so that they're
>>      zero when read back again).
>> c) It is inherited by fork.
>> d) It doesn't count against the mlock budget, since nothing is locked.
>>
>> This is fairly simple to implement, with the one snag that we have to
>> use 64-bit VM_* flags, but this shouldn't be a problem, since the only
>> consumers will probably be 64-bit anyway.
>>
>> This way, allocations used by vDSO getrandom() can use:
>>
>>       VM_DROPPABLE | VM_DONTDUMP | VM_WIPEONFORK | VM_NORESERVE
>>
>> And there will be no problem with using memory when not in use, not
>> wiping on fork(), coredumps, or writing out to swap.
>>
>> In order to let vDSO getrandom() use this, expose these via mmap(2) as
>> MAP_DROPPABLE.
>>
>> Finally, the provided self test ensures that this is working as desired.
> 
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> 
> 
> I'll try to think of some corner cases we might be missing.

BTW, do we have to handle the folio_set_swapbacked() in sort_folio() as well?


	/* dirty lazyfree */
	if (type == LRU_GEN_FILE && folio_test_anon(folio) && folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
		success = lru_gen_del_folio(lruvec, folio, true);
		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!success, folio);
		folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
		lruvec_add_folio_tail(lruvec, folio);
		return true;
	}

Maybe more difficult because we don't have a VMA here ... hmm

IIUC, we have to make sure that no folio_set_swapbacked() would ever get
performed on these folios, correct?

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-10  4:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240709130513.98102-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
2024-07-09 13:05 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-10  3:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-10  4:05     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-07-11  0:44       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11  4:32         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11  4:46           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11  5:07             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-11 17:09               ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 17:17                 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 17:24                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 17:27                     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 17:54                       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 17:56                         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 18:08                           ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 18:24                             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 18:54                               ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 18:56                                 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 19:18                                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 19:20                                     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 19:49                                       ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-11 19:52                                         ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-11 19:53                                         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 19:58                                           ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-11 20:59                                             ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 20:20                                         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 20:59                                           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 17:49                     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 17:57                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-11 19:07                   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 19:17                     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-11 19:22                       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-11 20:07                   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 20:17                     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2024-07-11 22:29     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-12  1:21       ` Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9b400450-46bc-41c7-9e89-825993851101@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhildenb@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox