From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, shy828301@gmail.com,
riel@surriel.com, jannh@google.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ioworker0@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 1/2] mm/tlb: skip redundant IPI when TLB flush already synchronized
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 14:37:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b1cb571-99df-44f8-8c0e-8e9bc3f6e8d5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7472056a-3919-429a-845d-c2076496d537@linux.dev>
Hi David,
On 2026/1/7 00:10, Lance Yang wrote:
[..]
>> What could work is tracking "tlb_table_flush_sent_ipi" really when we
>> are flushing the TLB for removed/unshared tables, and maybe resetting
>> it ... I don't know when from the top of my head.
>
Seems like we could fix the issue that the flag lifetime was broken
if the MMU gather gets reused by splitting the flush and reset. This
ensures the flag stays valid between flush and sync.
Now tlb_flush_unshared_tables() does:
1) __tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() - flush only, keeps flags alive
2) tlb_gather_remove_table_sync_one() - can check the flag
3) __tlb_reset_range() - reset everything after sync
Something like this:
---8<---
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
index 3975f7d11553..a95b054dfcca 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
@@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ static inline void __tlb_reset_range(struct
mmu_gather *tlb)
tlb->cleared_puds = 0;
tlb->cleared_p4ds = 0;
tlb->unshared_tables = 0;
+ tlb->tlb_flush_sent_ipi = 0;
/*
* Do not reset mmu_gather::vma_* fields here, we do not
* call into tlb_start_vma() again to set them if there is an
@@ -492,7 +493,7 @@ tlb_update_vma_flags(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct
vm_area_struct *vma)
tlb->vma_pfn |= !!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_PFNMAP|VM_MIXEDMAP));
}
-static inline void tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+static inline void __tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
{
/*
* Anything calling __tlb_adjust_range() also sets at least one of
@@ -503,6 +504,11 @@ static inline void tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(struct
mmu_gather *tlb)
return;
tlb_flush(tlb);
+}
+
+static inline void tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+ __tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
__tlb_reset_range(tlb);
}
@@ -824,7 +830,7 @@ static inline void tlb_flush_unshared_tables(struct
mmu_gather *tlb)
* flush the TLB for the unsharer now.
*/
if (tlb->unshared_tables)
- tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
+ __tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
/*
* Similarly, we must make sure that concurrent GUP-fast will not
@@ -834,14 +840,16 @@ static inline void
tlb_flush_unshared_tables(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
* We only perform this when we are the last sharer of a page table,
* as the IPI will reach all CPUs: any GUP-fast.
*
- * Note that on configs where tlb_remove_table_sync_one() is a NOP,
- * the expectation is that the tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() would have issued
- * required IPIs already for us.
+ * Use tlb_gather_remove_table_sync_one() instead of
+ * tlb_remove_table_sync_one() to skip the redundant IPI if the
+ * TLB flush above already sent one.
*/
if (tlb->fully_unshared_tables) {
- tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
+ tlb_gather_remove_table_sync_one(tlb);
tlb->fully_unshared_tables = false;
}
+
+ __tlb_reset_range(tlb);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING */
---
For khugepaged, it should be fine - it uses a local mmu_gather that
doesn't get reused. The lifetime is simply:
tlb_gather_mmu() → flush → sync → tlb_finish_mmu()
Let me know if this addresses your concern :)
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-06 12:03 [PATCH RESEND v3 0/2] skip redundant TLB sync IPIs Lance Yang
2026-01-06 12:03 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 1/2] mm/tlb: skip redundant IPI when TLB flush already synchronized Lance Yang
2026-01-06 15:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-06 16:10 ` Lance Yang
2026-01-07 6:37 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-01-09 14:11 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-09 14:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-09 15:30 ` Lance Yang
2026-01-09 15:40 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-06 16:24 ` Dave Hansen
2026-01-07 2:47 ` Lance Yang
2026-01-06 12:03 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 2/2] mm: introduce pmdp_collapse_flush_sync() to skip redundant IPI Lance Yang
2026-01-06 15:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2026-01-06 15:41 ` Lance Yang
2026-01-07 9:46 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-07 10:52 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b1cb571-99df-44f8-8c0e-8e9bc3f6e8d5@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox