From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0A2C5B543 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 07:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A6AD06B008C; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 03:51:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A42996B0092; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 03:51:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 930716B0127; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 03:51:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746476B008C for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 03:51:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BF6141CF2 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 07:51:14 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83520576468.03.7577DC0 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97476180009 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2025 07:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=aFN21FWH; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1749109871; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=tNvYJN/u2e7HUkQZm+DqJE+py35txakS1gvaoL6MlDk=; b=Lb9kaG7Zm3MJBMecLNc4lIXGVKO8Z6sQQ4YxhrHpPAHQGQt3smSL3IOCDbIA8c+kR/wC0F LoSTrmy8tPxwik9noeJ47/vkUuAR87DeR94HetC7EPi9SPSq+MNFbWQvKZoHe+Z54jfcV2 B4NYBpFQ5vU5FyuI7nIMAdDwkGilmdY= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1749109871; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KZMN60WTd9XvgIv8VFRoWylab0OR7C7shMjHX0pYbwwREzhNN/h+83LrisRYo9YdDNrf6s JDqu9+Hf+kuGmCWidyKRi42x1i3nVb5xcPcoecQgep7GzTM1xqrUfbdkDJYKLkxqPHZcof SwLz5iQ+g80Bviwj42BjiZzEick5eiA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=aFN21FWH; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.133.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1749109870; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=tNvYJN/u2e7HUkQZm+DqJE+py35txakS1gvaoL6MlDk=; b=aFN21FWHka9N93Ei9jZ85BvZ/xElI0JoSgDr5qMEq2bNmvTt0M55Jrw3PQ7p5URTbcKqow 8cLiRGme5uF2O2xxMWxeLComUkb4xOOnvYC8SH7IAVT8yafRHDjmamDuZ2lH6rWmAZhppo +qw/Xwa0mRH+FD0np+sVRlnQGxzarUg= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-564-4eRtcpV5PqaEp4sR0E7n0A-1; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 03:51:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4eRtcpV5PqaEp4sR0E7n0A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 4eRtcpV5PqaEp4sR0E7n0A_1749109868 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-451ac1b43c4so3715475e9.0 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1749109868; x=1749714668; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tNvYJN/u2e7HUkQZm+DqJE+py35txakS1gvaoL6MlDk=; b=u+deY/Ej7eC9gt3DxW1FKPh4P1tV/Mbci76wAN02ugft7lvUtX/8a5nYf+D5YyjBX0 aOSQL0tagl2zUIBS/VdhgZzjeg5IOXEgup3goE7pSay7zf2UfyMYHoPNPoPe2QEo1Hsd zxiGf7oyD2M6NPRK85iMn2IOlAf91W/USTkpG3E9PEElmAiIGc3+Lfsyt3mWSR4uXHTT aX4ANaDEa9551xRgE/4oYMpSRf1wg4vXAkbfPDOup8ckfilnH+SdCtpvAWR7aEqX2pgi o8iOAra9GrDqgEMS5Yoggn8t/11nCkjOOajVcWBE+3T3HaE7x5NhUK8E5PsBnQy02iPw uOWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwfNuZsBvm1clWtnKd1T5NkO9IuhzbVnuWJUYjmmf4HLgyIYe/I /v0Fj4ndSeGjNh3bA3sRTGAPijuK5tgW4ykHnrUqhtWqlXKSQiWpAI6Ha8eHMqlj5IMQvtTmEq8 Z890OSGRUHQo6cfRBvHaEIDz7nhCq+TVxpEo6x6goFXgpDim6nMwp X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct/fZZbSMyIwnY4C91Edkv9Fii1otheg3O4vOzBoGZTXsFpjWFjqXBgVV/SSb9 UMoK29Fte9Zsb4pMj69L1WbZNC9E37ZxKjyoJui8vZ/7zHRcYBFTcYxLkXooG1y9iDiiqXCIa9C 5tSaDpI5A1PGJjkSPaeOhe2fYAJUv0kAsvLWDKEtm9r1ouTjG/x19KigwXRbweytqHhRyH9GADg xUCaxjlfRmRiS0vPXAYbDoXtlwc9N/qfwsQnZzE6fqRIULPmKZ/x5qy0MUl/aQcp8bbvmfXuFb7 T5JBNA7TOTxXFYdCYeLh8h895W79hgV819u5ZaGz3uYFPgiC9YKG23e8hT52Wmne9ubwZvx5Qem JSSxZTpHZnShqZ53ENjclCvo0+6A/1gfkEvC3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ec6:b0:450:cc3d:6a03 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-451f0a64ebdmr50638125e9.7.1749109868121; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IENWTTd3iu3beojcHtFz+lgH+jQcJTxJI8osjg48/g4lotqM1tkBXHSPzeGfzNO8J1N6GqTvQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ec6:b0:450:cc3d:6a03 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-451f0a64ebdmr50637785e9.7.1749109867668; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:d8:2f27:ec00:4f4d:d38:ba97:9aa2? (p200300d82f27ec004f4d0d38ba979aa2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:d8:2f27:ec00:4f4d:d38:ba97:9aa2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3a5253a7a2fsm2368776f8f.18.2025.06.05.00.51.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9b04871b-33fb-42cb-840b-88fdb6b93c48@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:51:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gup: optimize longterm pin_user_pages() for large folio To: lizhe.67@bytedance.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, jhubbard@nvidia.com, peterx@redhat.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev.jain@arm.com, muchun.song@linux.dev References: <20250605033430.83142-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20250605033430.83142-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: Fpz6nvFwybVcWTavjpkM3QYxnjqmGI9uTxUMjX-YlZw_1749109868 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 97476180009 X-Stat-Signature: oqrgadu43iehq6sdc4mj57816mmwftbg X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1749109871-536224 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX18oKLatI8/IvI1iLnut8bx63x3ckPo9hr9XFAJdO8qM9NimAdxjUP793qaLL53/wCu9M1X6U2cXHXygzoK3IGsFHg9tvs0zcOD/5pmq7+Re+o0mr27S6/hVZ1lFq9ihLY85KkxPQZevLWPa4HpWqoaiOrIZVHBPAMJZlBNI1w/mHLzr1iKI5bJwS51Zw053MIk8zcN0SwICUu41bQPFNz25a3YnI4FBO7y5r/udUxKoUss/cnT9v/rV0dgfZcVBhTJE9L8Iba+BxxWrRiOGyxrMScPKN0mq+/5svXZmqCuEsbTfAoG5hwYLyUH4HsxCWRhvOSKp14jdQf4SVP+QCugklnuYdW/cOrbuDUH71U6m5FolT6hYSEj89jm39tkFWuArp6QMpPkFkyiZ6vyLMb8gvfh8YL7l6o2J53nLiRrYfTrzycjDQxgdNA5ArYChXNRGBMpJWlxf4f0w/s1YlhqpK0OAmTHwdgwhLuTfV9xs099eR75WMwFTPCBQD/C7EoB66XE7GmAiTZFxHrJGucdEPas/b/hXK0ZFwNis/TXtDhKb94YL5/biwadfygtGYOGng7kjP5Xdxa2uHlBR++yXQxM8SEUHGExr8fpoQP4cc5sp0KVt9I+s8aocdNt466B2tcsP/uY+bV/3apsI6Bh3lNz3zo+lMYdWzsM+UecOjvZkUFh9FXUd2uyGltESh+UZfELuxFUN56ckAK+EWyWP1IT7skErvb6FuojEZhYMyk0aBccK4N4aU1H2AKiP7B9DZx0lPCCmRU+HN8jhJ31KurLwBz5Gh9HUcfrZKhB86Z923svbbSqh+fzkP7lO+3Iv4RAf5KrWHykiza/0FYAe7W5rdorA+zvSYfxgRem+VXSHMnWqh7OGguoSPKABiYc1XKbLTsay3qgXTnhn87+SF9VS+krQwvRaP9+aGYBS3xo5jDtaNjL3VIA/+kky8rCjNGJRe61 U2XgHnTK 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 05.06.25 05:34, lizhe.67@bytedance.com wrote: > From: Li Zhe > > In the current implementation of the longterm pin_user_pages() function, > we invoke the collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() function. This function > iterates through the list to check whether each folio belongs to the > "longterm_unpinnabled" category. The folios in this list essentially > correspond to a contiguous region of user-space addresses, with each folio > representing a physical address in increments of PAGESIZE. If this > user-space address range is mapped with large folio, we can optimize the > performance of function collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() by reducing > the using of READ_ONCE() invoked in > pofs_get_folio()->page_folio()->_compound_head(). Also, we can simplify > the logic of collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios(). Instead of comparing > with prev_folio after calling pofs_get_folio(), we can check whether the > next page is within the same folio. > > The performance test results, based on v6.15, obtained through the > gup_test tool from the kernel source tree are as follows. We achieve an > improvement of over 66% for large folio with pagesize=2M. For small folio, > we have only observed a very slight degradation in performance. > > Without this patch: > > [root@localhost ~] ./gup_test -HL -m 8192 -n 512 > TAP version 13 > 1..1 > # PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK: Time: get:14391 put:10858 us# > ok 1 ioctl status 0 > # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > [root@localhost ~]# ./gup_test -LT -m 8192 -n 512 > TAP version 13 > 1..1 > # PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK: Time: get:130538 put:31676 us# > ok 1 ioctl status 0 > # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > With this patch: > > [root@localhost ~] ./gup_test -HL -m 8192 -n 512 > TAP version 13 > 1..1 > # PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK: Time: get:4867 put:10516 us# > ok 1 ioctl status 0 > # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > [root@localhost ~]# ./gup_test -LT -m 8192 -n 512 > TAP version 13 > 1..1 > # PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK: Time: get:131798 put:31328 us# > ok 1 ioctl status 0 > # Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhe > --- > Changelogs: > > v2->v3: > - Update performance test data based on v6.15. > - Refine the description of the optimization approach in commit message. > - Fix some issues of code formatting. > - Fine-tune the conditions for entering the optimization path. > > v1->v2: > - Modify some unreliable code. > - Update performance test data. > > v2 patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250604031536.9053-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com/ > v1 patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250530092351.32709-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com/ > > mm/gup.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c > index 84461d384ae2..9fbe3592b5fc 100644 > --- a/mm/gup.c > +++ b/mm/gup.c > @@ -2317,6 +2317,31 @@ static void pofs_unpin(struct pages_or_folios *pofs) > unpin_user_pages(pofs->pages, pofs->nr_entries); > } > > +static struct folio *pofs_next_folio(struct folio *folio, > + struct pages_or_folios *pofs, long *index_ptr) ^ use two tabs here > +{ > + long i = *index_ptr + 1; > + > + if (!pofs->has_folios && folio_test_large(folio)) { > + const unsigned long start_pfn = folio_pfn(folio); > + const unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + folio_nr_pages(folio); > + > + for (; i < pofs->nr_entries; i++) { > + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(pofs->pages[i]); > + > + /* Is this page part of this folio? */ > + if (pfn < start_pfn || pfn >= end_pfn) > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (unlikely(i == pofs->nr_entries)) > + return NULL; > + *index_ptr = i; > + > + return pofs_get_folio(pofs, i); > +} > + > /* > * Returns the number of collected folios. Return value is always >= 0. > */ > @@ -2324,16 +2349,12 @@ static void collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios( > struct list_head *movable_folio_list, > struct pages_or_folios *pofs) > { > - struct folio *prev_folio = NULL; > bool drain_allow = true; > - unsigned long i; > - > - for (i = 0; i < pofs->nr_entries; i++) { > - struct folio *folio = pofs_get_folio(pofs, i); > + struct folio *folio; > + long i = 0; > > - if (folio == prev_folio) > - continue; > - prev_folio = folio; > + for (folio = pofs_get_folio(pofs, i); folio; > + folio = pofs_next_folio(folio, pofs, &i)) { As discussed, align both "folios" (using tabs and then spaces) Acked-by: David Hildenbrand -- Cheers, David / dhildenb