From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
To: n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS issue
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:13:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9af6b35d-bfbf-7f87-a419-042dff018fdd@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1565112345-28754-1-git-send-email-jane.chu@oracle.com>
Hi, Naoya,
What is the status of the patches?
Is there anything I need to do from my end ?
Regards,
-jane
On 8/6/2019 10:25 AM, Jane Chu wrote:
> Change in v4:
> - remove trailing white space
>
> Changes in v3:
> - move **tk cleanup to its own patch
>
> Changes in v2:
> - move 'tk' allocations internal to add_to_kill(), suggested by Dan;
> - ran checkpatch.pl check, pointed out by Matthew;
> - Noaya pointed out that v1 would have missed the SIGKILL
> if "tk->addr == -EFAULT", since the code returns early.
> Incorporated Noaya's suggestion, also, skip VMAs where
> "tk->size_shift == 0" for zone device page, and deliver SIGBUS
> when "tk->size_shift != 0" so the payload is helpful;
> - added Suggested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
>
> Jane Chu (2):
> mm/memory-failure.c clean up around tk pre-allocation
> mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS if
> mmaped more than once
>
> mm/memory-failure.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-08 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-06 17:25 Jane Chu
2019-08-06 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/memory-failure.c clean up around tk pre-allocation Jane Chu
2019-08-06 21:05 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-06 17:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS if mmaped more than once Jane Chu
2019-08-06 21:11 ` Dan Williams
2019-10-08 18:13 ` Jane Chu [this message]
2019-10-08 23:18 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] mm/memory-failure: Poison read receives SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS issue Naoya Horiguchi
2019-10-09 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-10 1:22 ` Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9af6b35d-bfbf-7f87-a419-042dff018fdd@oracle.com \
--to=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox