From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Hugepage program taking forever to exit
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:08:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a924b36-aea7-4492-912a-a7ab4f2cbb96@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOUHufZXqC9i5qL+XMpqPkkyg8grb_g0nCBKyLvXxvEjtq1C2Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/10/24 2:17 PM, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 12:21?PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Investigating another issue, I wrote the following simple program that allocates
>> and faults in 500 1GB huge pages, and then registers them with io_uring. Each
>> step is timed:
>>
>> Got 500 huge pages (each 1024MB) in 0 msec
>> Faulted in 500 huge pages in 38632 msec
>> Registered 500 pages in 867 msec
>>
>> and as expected, faulting in the pages takes (by far) the longest. From
>> the above, you'd also expect the total runtime to be around ~39 seconds.
>> But it is not... In fact it takes 82 seconds in total for this program
>> to have exited. Looking at why, I see:
>>
>> [<0>] __wait_rcu_gp+0x12b/0x160
>> [<0>] synchronize_rcu_normal.part.0+0x2a/0x30
>> [<0>] hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios+0x22/0xe0
>> [<0>] update_and_free_pages_bulk+0x4c/0x220
>> [<0>] return_unused_surplus_pages+0x80/0xa0
>> [<0>] hugetlb_acct_memory.part.0+0x2dd/0x3b0
>> [<0>] hugetlb_vm_op_close+0x160/0x180
>> [<0>] remove_vma+0x20/0x60
>> [<0>] exit_mmap+0x199/0x340
>> [<0>] mmput+0x49/0x110
>> [<0>] do_exit+0x261/0x9b0
>> [<0>] do_group_exit+0x2c/0x80
>> [<0>] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x14/0x20
>> [<0>] x64_sys_call+0x714/0x720
>> [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160
>> [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
>>
>> and yes, it does look like the program is mostly idle for most of the
>> time while returning these huge pages. It's also telling us exactly why
>> we're just sitting idle - RCU grace period.
>>
>> The below quick change means the runtime of the program is pretty much
>> just the time it takes to execute the parts of it, as you can see from
>> the full output after the change:
>>
>> axboe@r7525 ~> time sudo ./reg-huge
>> Got 500 huge pages (each 1024MB) in 0 msec
>> Faulted in 500 huge pages in 38632 msec
>> Registered 500 pages in 867 msec
>>
>> ________________________________________________________
>> Executed in 39.53 secs fish external
>> usr time 4.88 millis 238.00 micros 4.64 millis
>> sys time 0.00 millis 0.00 micros 0.00 millis
>>
>> where 38632+876 == 39.51s.
>>
>> Looks like this was introduced by:
>>
>> commit bd225530a4c717714722c3731442b78954c765b3
>> Author: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
>> Date: Thu Jun 27 16:27:05 2024 -0600
>
> Fixes are in git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-stable
>
> c2a967f6ab0e mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: don't synchronize_rcu() without HVO
> c0f398c3b2cf mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: batch HVO work when demoting
>
> Additional improvements from mm-stable that may or may not help your test case:
>
> e98337d11bbd mm/contig_alloc: support __GFP_COMP
> 463586e9ff39 mm/cma: add cma_{alloc,free}_folio()
> cf54f310d0d3 mm/hugetlb: use __GFP_COMP for gigantic folios
I didn't pick patches, just pulled all of mm-stable - yep that fixes it
for me, no longer spending 60+% of the runtime during exit. I trust
these are heading to stable?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 18:21 Jens Axboe
2024-09-10 19:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-09-10 20:17 ` Yu Zhao
2024-09-10 23:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2024-09-11 3:42 ` Andrew Morton
2024-09-11 13:22 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-11 16:23 ` Yu Zhao
2024-09-11 18:38 ` Andrew Morton
2024-09-11 22:08 ` Yu Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a924b36-aea7-4492-912a-a7ab4f2cbb96@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox