From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B2C66B005A for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:00:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dike, Jeffrey G" Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:00:13 -0700 Subject: RE: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages? Message-ID: <9EECC02A4CC333418C00A85D21E89326B651C1FE@azsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20090805024058.GA8886@localhost> <4A79C70C.6010200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4A79C70C.6010200@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Rik van Riel , "Wu, Fengguang" Cc: "Yu, Wilfred" , "Kleen, Andi" , Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , KOSAKI Motohiro , Mel Gorman , LKML , linux-mm List-ID: > Also, the inactive list (where references to anonymous pages > _do_ count) is pretty big. Is it not big enough in Jeff's > test case? > Jeff, what kind of workloads are you running in the guests? I'm looking at KVM on small systems. My "small system" is a 128M memory co= mpartment on a 4G server. The workload is boot up the instance, start Firefox and another app (whatev= er editor comes by default with Moblin), close them, and shut down the inst= ance. Jeff -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org