From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
Cc: david@fromorbit.com, willy@infradead.org,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
hare@suse.de, p.raghav@samsung.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
gost.dev@samsung.com, cl@os.amperecomputing.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 08:49:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9CD4A1A7-E378-49A5-85F8-4566B019231A@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240709110423.wdteahoeufrt22jk@quentin>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1236 bytes --]
On 9 Jul 2024, at 7:04, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
>>
>> This should be
>>
>> if (!folio->mapping) {
>> if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
>> count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> Otherwise, a non PMD mappable folio with no mapping will fall through
>> and cause NULL pointer dereference in mapping_min_folio_order().
>
> Ah, of course. I thought I was being "smart" here to avoid another
> nesting. Instead of triple nested ifs, I guess this is better:
>
> int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
> {
> unsigned int min_order = 0;
>
> if (folio_test_anon(folio))
> goto out;
>
> if (!folio->mapping) {
> if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
> out:
> return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list,
> min_order);
> }
>
> Let me know what you think!
LGTM. Thanks. With this change, feel free to add Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 11:23 [PATCH v9 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-08 13:53 ` Zi Yan
2024-07-09 11:04 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 12:49 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] filemap: cap PTE range to be created to allowed zero fill in folio_map_range() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 15:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-04 22:13 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-05 6:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-05 14:19 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-08 17:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-08 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] xfs: use kvmalloc for xattr buffers Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 11:23 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-08 22:12 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS Luis Chamberlain
2024-07-08 22:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-08 22:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9CD4A1A7-E378-49A5-85F8-4566B019231A@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox