From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <99Nov3.094606gmt.66315@gateway.ukaea.org.uk> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 09:48:11 +0000 From: Neil Conway MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: The 4GB memory thing Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------8C597550CEC840E9F68E4220" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Linux MM List-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------8C597550CEC840E9F68E4220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The recent thread about >4GB surprised me, as I didn't even think >2GB was very stable yet. Am I wrong? Are people out there using 4GB boxes with decent stability? I presume it's a 2.3 feature, yes? Sorry for my ignorance, I guess I've been dozing a bit of late. Neil --------------8C597550CEC840E9F68E4220 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <38200466.5839E78E@ukaea.org.uk> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 09:46:14 +0000 From: Neil Conway Organization: Fusion X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13pre14 i686) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-smp@vger.rutgers.edu" Subject: The 4GB memory thing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The recent thread about >4GB surprised me, as I didn't even think >2GB was very stable yet. Am I wrong? Are people out there using 4GB boxes with decent stability? I presume it's a 2.3 feature, yes? Sorry for my ignorance, I guess I've been dozing a bit of late. Neil --------------8C597550CEC840E9F68E4220-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/