linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.2 v2 05/12] mm/khugepaged: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS check in hugepage_pmd_enabled()
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:14:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <998c02b6-2612-42c1-8099-d65ae275d1a2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84B8F641-A3DF-4219-AA57-6BA48E9B4998@nvidia.com>

On 4/14/26 18:30, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2026, at 7:02, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> 
>> On 4/13/26 22:42, Zi Yan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I assume such a change should come before patch #4, as it seems to affect
>> the functionality that depended on CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS.
> 
> If the goal is to have a knob of khugepaged for all files, yes I will move
> the change before Patch 4.
> 
>>
>>> I thought about this, but it means khugepaged is turned on regardless of
>>> anon and shmem configs. I tend to think the original code was a bug,
>>> since enabling CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS would enable khugepaged all
>>> the time.
>>
>> There might be some FS mapping to collapse? So that makes sense to
>> some degree.
>>
>> I really don't like the side-effects of "/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled".
>> Like, enabling khugepaged+PMD for files.
>>
> 
> I am not a fan either, but I was not sure about another sysfs knob.
> 

Yeah, it would be better if we could avoid it. But the dependency on the
global toggle as it is today is a bit weird.

>>>
>>>
>>> Alternatives could be:
>>> 1. to add a file-backed khhugepaged config, but another sysfs?
>>
>> Maybe that would be the time to decouple file THP logic from
>> hugepage_global_enabled()/hugepage_global_always().
>>
>> In particular, as pagecache folio allocation doesn't really care about __thp_vma_allowable_orders() IIRC.
>>
>> I'm thinking about something like the following:
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index b2a6060b3c20..fb3a4fd84fe0 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -184,15 +184,6 @@ unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>                                                    forced_collapse);
>>
>>         if (!vma_is_anonymous(vma)) {
>> -               /*
>> -                * Enforce THP collapse requirements as necessary. Anonymous vmas
>> -                * were already handled in thp_vma_allowable_orders().
>> -                */
>> -               if (!forced_collapse &&
>> -                   (!hugepage_global_enabled() || (!(vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE) &&
>> -                                                   !hugepage_global_always())))
>> -                       return 0;
>> -
>>                 /*
>>                  * Trust that ->huge_fault() handlers know what they are doing
>>                  * in fault path.
> 
> Looks reasonable.

I don't think there is other interaction with FS and the global toggle
besides this and the one you are adjusting, right?

> 
>>
>> Then, we might indeed just want a khugepaged toggle whether to enable it at
>> all in files. (or just a toggle to disable khugeapged entirely?)
>>
> 
> I think hugepage_global_enabled() should be enough to decide whether khugepaged
> should run or not.

That would also be an option and would likely avoid other toggles.

So __thp_vma_allowable_orders() would allows THPs in any case for FS,
but hugepage_global_enabled() would control whether khugepaged runs (for
fs).

It gives less flexibility, but likely that's ok.

> 
> Currently, we have thp_vma_allowable_orders() to filter each VMAs and I do not
> see a reason to use hugepage_pmd_enabled() to guard khugepaged daemon. I am
> going to just remove hugepage_pmd_enabled() and replace it with
> hugepage_global_enabled(). Let me know your thoughts.

Can you send a quick draft of what you have in mind?

> 
> BTW, this conflicts with Patch 12 from Nico’s khugepaged for mTHP patchset.

Right. I guess it can be handled.

-- 
Cheers,

David


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-14 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-13 19:20 [PATCH 7.2 v2 00/12] Remove read-only THP support for FSes without large folio support Zi Yan
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 01/12] mm/khugepaged: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS check Zi Yan
2026-04-13 20:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-13 20:34     ` Zi Yan
2026-04-14 10:19       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-14 10:20       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-14 10:29   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-14 15:37     ` Lance Yang
2026-04-14 15:43       ` Lance Yang
2026-04-14 15:59         ` Zi Yan
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 02/12] mm/khugepaged: add folio dirty check after try_to_unmap_flush() Zi Yan
2026-04-13 20:23   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-13 20:28     ` Zi Yan
2026-04-14 10:38   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-14 15:55     ` Zi Yan
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 03/12] mm/huge_memory: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS from file_thp_enabled() Zi Yan
2026-04-14 10:40   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-14 15:59     ` Zi Yan
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 04/12] mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Kconfig option Zi Yan
2026-04-14 10:40   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 05/12] mm/khugepaged: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS check in hugepage_pmd_enabled() Zi Yan
2026-04-13 20:33   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-13 20:42     ` Zi Yan
2026-04-14 11:02       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-14 16:30         ` Zi Yan
2026-04-14 18:14           ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-14 18:25             ` Zi Yan
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 06/12] mm: fs: remove filemap_nr_thps*() functions and their users Zi Yan
2026-04-13 20:35   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-14 11:02   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 07/12] fs: remove nr_thps from struct address_space Zi Yan
2026-04-13 20:38   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 08/12] mm/huge_memory: remove folio split check for READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Zi Yan
2026-04-13 20:41   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-13 20:46     ` Zi Yan
2026-04-14 11:03       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 09/12] mm/truncate: use folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio() Zi Yan
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 10/12] fs/btrfs: remove a comment referring to READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS Zi Yan
2026-04-14 11:06   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 11/12] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS in khugepaged Zi Yan
2026-04-14 11:06   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7.2 v2 12/12] selftests/mm: remove READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS from comments in guard-regions Zi Yan
2026-04-13 20:47   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-13 20:51     ` Zi Yan
2026-04-13 22:28       ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-14 11:09         ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-14 16:45           ` Zi Yan
2026-04-14 17:40             ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-14 17:53               ` Zi Yan
2026-04-14 11:07   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=998c02b6-2612-42c1-8099-d65ae275d1a2@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox