From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
ziy@nvidia.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, rppt@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/compaction: check the range to pageblock_pfn_to_page() is within the zone first
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 12:14:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99824e33-bf25-40ef-b969-a48e3b916ad1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002033140.24462-2-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On 02.10.25 05:31, Wei Yang wrote:
> Function pageblock_pfn_to_page() is introduced by commit 7d49d8868336
> ("mm, compaction: reduce zone checking frequency in the migration scanner"),
> where there is no requirement on start_pfn/end_pfn except they are in
> the same pageblock.
>
> So at that time, pageblock_pfn_to_page() would be passed with pfn
> without compared with zone boundary.
>
> But after commit 7cf91a98e607 ("mm/compaction: speed up
> pageblock_pfn_to_page() when zone is contiguous"), pageblock_pfn_to_page()
> would think the range is valid and in the same zone if zone->contiguous,
> even the range doesn't belong to this zone.
>
> For example, in fast_isolate_freepages(), min_pfn is assigned to
> pageblock_start_pfn() and passed to pageblock_pfn_to_page() without
> checking with zone_start_pfn. And mostly, the end_pfn is not checked
> with zone_end_pfn() before using.
>
> To make this function robust, check the range is within the zone first.
>
> Fixes: 7cf91a98e607 ("mm/compaction: speed up pageblock_pfn_to_page() when zone is contiguous")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> ---
> mm/internal.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 38607b2821d9..8e1a3819c9f1 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -724,6 +724,9 @@ extern struct page *__pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
> static inline struct page *pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long end_pfn, struct zone *zone)
> {
> + if (start_pfn < zone->zone_start_pfn || end_pfn > zone_end_pfn(zone))
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (zone->contiguous)
> return pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
>
fast_isolate_around() adjusts the range to the zone boundaries before
calling fast_isolate_around().
isolate_migratepages_range(), isolate_freepages_range(),
isolate_freepages() and isolate_migratepages similarly all seem to take
the zone range into account as well.
Only fast_isolate_freepages is a bit more tricky. It definitely takes
the end into account. The start comes from cc->free_pfn but IIRC it's
always above the zone_start_pfn.
So I wonder -- if we want to add such a check -- whether it should
instead be a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()?
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 3:31 [PATCH 0/2] mm/compaction: some fix for the range passed to pageblock_pfn_to_page() Wei Yang
2025-10-02 3:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/compaction: check the range to pageblock_pfn_to_page() is within the zone first Wei Yang
2025-10-08 10:14 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-10-09 2:08 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-09 7:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-02 3:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/compaction: fix the range to pageblock_pfn_to_page() Wei Yang
2025-10-08 10:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-08 11:16 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-09 3:39 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-08 1:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm/compaction: some fix for the range passed " Andrew Morton
2025-10-08 2:32 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-08 7:52 ` Michal Hocko
2025-10-08 9:13 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-08 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-11 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99824e33-bf25-40ef-b969-a48e3b916ad1@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox