linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>,
	david@fromorbit.com, willy@infradead.org,
	chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, john.g.garry@oracle.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
	p.raghav@samsung.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
	cl@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	Zi Yan <zi.yan@sent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:24:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98790338-0f86-4658-8dec-95e94b6d5c18@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240625114420.719014-4-kernel@pankajraghav.com>

On 25/06/2024 12:44, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> 
> page_cache_ra_unbounded() was allocating single pages (0 order folios)
> if there was no folio found in an index. Allocate mapping_min_order folios
> as we need to guarantee the minimum order if it is set.
> While we are at it, rework the loop in page_cache_ra_unbounded() to
> advance with the number of pages in a folio instead of just one page at
> a time.
> 
> page_cache_ra_order() tries to allocate folio to the page cache with a
> higher order if the index aligns with that order. Modify it so that the
> order does not go below the mapping_min_order requirement of the page
> cache. This function will do the right thing even if the new_order passed
> is less than the mapping_min_order.
> When adding new folios to the page cache we must also ensure the index
> used is aligned to the mapping_min_order as the page cache requires the
> index to be aligned to the order of the folio.
> 
> readahead_expand() is called from readahead aops to extend the range of
> the readahead so this function can assume ractl->_index to be aligned with
> min_order.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> Co-developed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  mm/readahead.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
> index 66058ae02f2e..2acfd6447d7b 100644
> --- a/mm/readahead.c
> +++ b/mm/readahead.c
> @@ -206,9 +206,10 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  		unsigned long nr_to_read, unsigned long lookahead_size)
>  {
>  	struct address_space *mapping = ractl->mapping;
> -	unsigned long index = readahead_index(ractl);
> +	unsigned long ra_folio_index, index = readahead_index(ractl);
>  	gfp_t gfp_mask = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
> -	unsigned long i;
> +	unsigned long mark, i = 0;
> +	unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Partway through the readahead operation, we will have added
> @@ -223,10 +224,26 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  	unsigned int nofs = memalloc_nofs_save();
>  
>  	filemap_invalidate_lock_shared(mapping);
> +	index = mapping_align_index(mapping, index);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * As iterator `i` is aligned to min_nrpages, round_up the
> +	 * difference between nr_to_read and lookahead_size to mark the
> +	 * index that only has lookahead or "async_region" to set the
> +	 * readahead flag.
> +	 */
> +	ra_folio_index = round_up(readahead_index(ractl) + nr_to_read - lookahead_size,
> +				  min_nrpages);
> +	mark = ra_folio_index - index;
> +	if (index != readahead_index(ractl)) {
> +		nr_to_read += readahead_index(ractl) - index;
> +		ractl->_index = index;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Preallocate as many pages as we will need.
>  	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < nr_to_read; i++) {
> +	while (i < nr_to_read) {
>  		struct folio *folio = xa_load(&mapping->i_pages, index + i);
>  		int ret;
>  
> @@ -240,12 +257,13 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  			 * not worth getting one just for that.
>  			 */

For the case that the folio is already in the xarray, perhaps its worth
asserting that the folio is at least min_nrpages?


>  			read_pages(ractl);
> -			ractl->_index++;
> -			i = ractl->_index + ractl->_nr_pages - index - 1;
> +			ractl->_index += min_nrpages;
> +			i = ractl->_index + ractl->_nr_pages - index;
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, 0);
> +		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask,
> +					    mapping_min_folio_order(mapping));
>  		if (!folio)
>  			break;
>  
> @@ -255,14 +273,15 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  			if (ret == -ENOMEM)
>  				break;
>  			read_pages(ractl);
> -			ractl->_index++;
> -			i = ractl->_index + ractl->_nr_pages - index - 1;
> +			ractl->_index += min_nrpages;
> +			i = ractl->_index + ractl->_nr_pages - index;
>  			continue;
>  		}
> -		if (i == nr_to_read - lookahead_size)
> +		if (i == mark)
>  			folio_set_readahead(folio);
>  		ractl->_workingset |= folio_test_workingset(folio);
> -		ractl->_nr_pages++;
> +		ractl->_nr_pages += min_nrpages;
> +		i += min_nrpages;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -492,13 +511,19 @@ void page_cache_ra_order(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  {
>  	struct address_space *mapping = ractl->mapping;
>  	pgoff_t index = readahead_index(ractl);
> +	unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
>  	pgoff_t limit = (i_size_read(mapping->host) - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	pgoff_t mark = index + ra->size - ra->async_size;
>  	unsigned int nofs;
>  	int err = 0;
>  	gfp_t gfp = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
> +	unsigned int min_ra_size = max(4, mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping));
>  
> -	if (!mapping_large_folio_support(mapping) || ra->size < 4)
> +	/*
> +	 * Fallback when size < min_nrpages as each folio should be
> +	 * at least min_nrpages anyway.
> +	 */
> +	if (!mapping_large_folio_support(mapping) || ra->size < min_ra_size)
>  		goto fallback;
>  
>  	limit = min(limit, index + ra->size - 1);
> @@ -507,11 +532,20 @@ void page_cache_ra_order(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  		new_order += 2;
>  		new_order = min(mapping_max_folio_order(mapping), new_order);
>  		new_order = min_t(unsigned int, new_order, ilog2(ra->size));
> +		new_order = max(new_order, min_order);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* See comment in page_cache_ra_unbounded() */
>  	nofs = memalloc_nofs_save();
>  	filemap_invalidate_lock_shared(mapping);
> +	/*
> +	 * If the new_order is greater than min_order and index is
> +	 * already aligned to new_order, then this will be noop as index
> +	 * aligned to new_order should also be aligned to min_order.
> +	 */
> +	ractl->_index = mapping_align_index(mapping, index);
> +	index = readahead_index(ractl);
> +
>  	while (index <= limit) {
>  		unsigned int order = new_order;
>  
> @@ -519,7 +553,7 @@ void page_cache_ra_order(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  		if (index & ((1UL << order) - 1))
>  			order = __ffs(index);
>  		/* Don't allocate pages past EOF */
> -		while (index + (1UL << order) - 1 > limit)
> +		while (order > min_order && index + (1UL << order) - 1 > limit)
>  			order--;
>  		err = ra_alloc_folio(ractl, index, mark, order, gfp);
>  		if (err)
> @@ -783,8 +817,15 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  	struct file_ra_state *ra = ractl->ra;
>  	pgoff_t new_index, new_nr_pages;
>  	gfp_t gfp_mask = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
> +	unsigned long min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
> +	unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
>  
>  	new_index = new_start / PAGE_SIZE;
> +	/*
> +	 * Readahead code should have aligned the ractl->_index to
> +	 * min_nrpages before calling readahead aops.
> +	 */
> +	VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(ractl->_index, min_nrpages));
>  
>  	/* Expand the leading edge downwards */
>  	while (ractl->_index > new_index) {
> @@ -794,9 +835,11 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  		if (folio && !xa_is_value(folio))
>  			return; /* Folio apparently present */
>  
> -		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, 0);
> +		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, min_order);
>  		if (!folio)
>  			return;
> +
> +		index = mapping_align_index(mapping, index);
>  		if (filemap_add_folio(mapping, folio, index, gfp_mask) < 0) {
>  			folio_put(folio);
>  			return;
> @@ -806,7 +849,7 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  			ractl->_workingset = true;
>  			psi_memstall_enter(&ractl->_pflags);
>  		}
> -		ractl->_nr_pages++;
> +		ractl->_nr_pages += min_nrpages;
>  		ractl->_index = folio->index;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -821,9 +864,11 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  		if (folio && !xa_is_value(folio))
>  			return; /* Folio apparently present */
>  
> -		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, 0);
> +		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, min_order);
>  		if (!folio)
>  			return;
> +
> +		index = mapping_align_index(mapping, index);
>  		if (filemap_add_folio(mapping, folio, index, gfp_mask) < 0) {
>  			folio_put(folio);
>  			return;
> @@ -833,10 +878,10 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
>  			ractl->_workingset = true;
>  			psi_memstall_enter(&ractl->_pflags);
>  		}
> -		ractl->_nr_pages++;
> +		ractl->_nr_pages += min_nrpages;
>  		if (ra) {
> -			ra->size++;
> -			ra->async_size++;
> +			ra->size += min_nrpages;
> +			ra->async_size += min_nrpages;
>  		}
>  	}
>  }



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-04 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-25 11:44 [PATCH v8 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 12:23   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-04 15:20     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-04 15:52       ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-04 21:28       ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 22:06       ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-04 23:56         ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-05  4:32           ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-05  9:03             ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-05 12:45               ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-05 13:24             ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-05 13:31               ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-05 14:14                 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-08 23:01                 ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-09  8:11                   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-09 13:08                   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-05 15:14             ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-04 21:34     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 16:29   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 16:38     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-09 17:33       ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 16:50     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-09 21:08       ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-09 21:59         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 15:52   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-06-25 18:06     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-02 19:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-03 14:10     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-04 14:24   ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-07-04 14:29     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 14:45   ` Zi Yan
2024-06-25 17:20     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] filemap: cap PTE range to be created to allowed zero fill in folio_map_range() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01 23:39   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01  2:37   ` Dave Chinner
2024-07-01 11:22     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01 23:40   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-02  7:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 10:15     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-02 12:02       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 14:01         ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-02 15:42           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 16:13             ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-02 16:51               ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-02 17:10                 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-03  5:16                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 16:50         ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-02 13:49       ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] xfs: use kvmalloc for xattr buffers Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 18:07   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01  2:33   ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01  2:34   ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-25 11:44 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-07-01  2:34   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98790338-0f86-4658-8dec-95e94b6d5c18@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=cl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=zi.yan@sent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox