linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com, peterx@redhat.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	kevin.brodsky@arm.com, quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, namit@vmware.com,
	hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:02:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9856f39d-d9d8-45c1-8e5a-514d21a86d51@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c0fd43d-8de9-4bd8-af05-83a4d9c8d9e6@arm.com>



On 30/04/25 11:44 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/30/25 11:19, Dev Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/04/25 11:13 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> On 4/29/25 10:53, Dev Jain wrote:
>>>> Override the generic definition to use get_and_clear_full_ptes(), so that
>>>> we do a TLBI possibly only on the "contpte-edges" of the large PTE block,
>>>> instead of doing it for every contpte block, which happens for ptep_get_and_clear().
>>>
>>> Could you please explain what does "contpte-edges" really signify in the
>>> context of large PTE blocks ? Also how TLBI operation only on these edges
>>> will never run into the risk of missing TLB invalidation of some other
>>> mapped areas ?
>>
>> We are doing a TLBI over the whole range already, in the mprotect code:
>> see tlb_flush_pte_range. What the arm64 internal API does, irrespective of the caller, is to do a TLBI for every contpte block in case of unfolding. We don't need that for the intermediate blocks because the caller does that. We do need a TLBI for the start and end contpte block,
>> because in case the range we are invalidating partially covers them, then the caller will not do a TLBI for the non-overlapped PTEs of the block.
> 
> But is not splitting the TLBI flush responsibility between the callers
> (intermediate blocks) and the platform API (contpte-edges) - some what
> problematic from a semantics perspective, and will be more susceptible
> for missing TLB flushes etc ?

I seem to agree that this is a semantic problem. Although, we won't ever 
miss a TLB flush - we will only have extras. It is the responsibility of 
the caller to do the TLBI, the platform API is only checking whether we 
need some more TLBIs.

> 
>> I'll explain some more in the changelog next version.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h |  5 +++++
>>>>    arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c              | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>    include/linux/pgtable.h          |  4 ++++
>>>>    mm/pgtable-generic.c             | 16 +++++++++++-----
>>>>    4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> index 2a77f11b78d5..8872ea5f0642 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> @@ -1553,6 +1553,11 @@ extern void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>                        unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>>>>                        pte_t old_pte, pte_t new_pte);
>>>>    +#define modify_prot_start_ptes modify_prot_start_ptes
>>>> +extern pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> +                    unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>>>> +                    unsigned int nr);
>>>> +
>>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE
>>>>      /*
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>>> index 8fcf59ba39db..fe60be8774f4 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>>> @@ -1523,7 +1523,8 @@ static int __init prevent_bootmem_remove_init(void)
>>>>    early_initcall(prevent_bootmem_remove_init);
>>>>    #endif
>>>>    -pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>>>> +pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>>>> +                 pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
>>>>    {
>>>>        if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2645198)) {
>>>>            /*
>>>> @@ -1532,9 +1533,14 @@ pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte
>>>>             * in cases where cpu is affected with errata #2645198.
>>>>             */
>>>>            if (pte_user_exec(ptep_get(ptep)))
>>>> -            return ptep_clear_flush(vma, addr, ptep);
>>>> +            return clear_flush_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, nr);
>>>>        }
>>>> -    return ptep_get_and_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
>>>> +    return get_and_clear_full_ptes(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, nr, 0);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    return modify_prot_start_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, 1);
>>>>    }
>>>>      void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> index ed287289335f..10cdb87ccecf 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> @@ -828,6 +828,10 @@ extern pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>                      pte_t *ptep);
>>>>    #endif
>>>>    +extern pte_t clear_flush_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> +                  unsigned long address,
>>>> +                  pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr);
>>>> +
>>>>    #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_HUGE_CLEAR_FLUSH
>>>>    extern pmd_t pmdp_huge_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>                      unsigned long address,
>>>> diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>>>> index 5a882f2b10f9..e238f88c3cac 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>>>> @@ -90,17 +90,23 @@ int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>    }
>>>>    #endif
>>>>    -#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_FLUSH
>>>> -pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>>> -               pte_t *ptep)
>>>> +pte_t clear_flush_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>>> +               pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
>>>>    {
>>>>        struct mm_struct *mm = (vma)->vm_mm;
>>>>        pte_t pte;
>>>> -    pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, ptep);
>>>> +    pte = get_and_clear_full_ptes(mm, address, ptep, nr, 0);
>>>>        if (pte_accessible(mm, pte))
>>>> -        flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
>>>> +        flush_tlb_range(vma, address, address + nr * PAGE_SIZE);
>>>>        return pte;
>>>>    }
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_FLUSH
>>>> +pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>>> +               pte_t *ptep)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    return clear_flush_ptes(vma, address, ptep, 1);
>>>> +}
>>>>    #endif
>>>>      #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>>
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-30  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29  5:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Dev Jain
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: Refactor code in mprotect Dev Jain
2025-04-29  6:41   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29  6:54     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 11:00   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-04-29  7:14   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29  8:59     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 13:19   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30  6:37     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 13:18       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-30 13:36         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-04-29  8:39   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29  9:01     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 13:52   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30  6:25     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 14:37       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 14:30         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-06 15:03           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 14:09     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-30 14:34       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-01 11:33         ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-01 12:58           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 14:28             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30  5:35   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-30  5:45   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-30 14:16   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start Dev Jain
2025-04-30  5:43   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-30  5:49     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30  6:14       ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-30  6:32         ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit Dev Jain
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable() Dev Jain
2025-04-29  9:15   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29  9:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 13:57       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 14:00         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30  5:44         ` Dev Jain
2025-05-06  9:16       ` Dev Jain
2025-05-06 14:34         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30  6:17   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching Dev Jain
2025-04-29  7:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Lance Yang
2025-04-29  9:02   ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 10:41     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30  5:42       ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30  6:22         ` Lance Yang
2025-04-30  7:07           ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 11:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 14:02   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9856f39d-d9d8-45c1-8e5a-514d21a86d51@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox