From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com, peterx@redhat.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org,
kevin.brodsky@arm.com, quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, namit@vmware.com,
hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:02:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9856f39d-d9d8-45c1-8e5a-514d21a86d51@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c0fd43d-8de9-4bd8-af05-83a4d9c8d9e6@arm.com>
On 30/04/25 11:44 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 4/30/25 11:19, Dev Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/04/25 11:13 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> On 4/29/25 10:53, Dev Jain wrote:
>>>> Override the generic definition to use get_and_clear_full_ptes(), so that
>>>> we do a TLBI possibly only on the "contpte-edges" of the large PTE block,
>>>> instead of doing it for every contpte block, which happens for ptep_get_and_clear().
>>>
>>> Could you please explain what does "contpte-edges" really signify in the
>>> context of large PTE blocks ? Also how TLBI operation only on these edges
>>> will never run into the risk of missing TLB invalidation of some other
>>> mapped areas ?
>>
>> We are doing a TLBI over the whole range already, in the mprotect code:
>> see tlb_flush_pte_range. What the arm64 internal API does, irrespective of the caller, is to do a TLBI for every contpte block in case of unfolding. We don't need that for the intermediate blocks because the caller does that. We do need a TLBI for the start and end contpte block,
>> because in case the range we are invalidating partially covers them, then the caller will not do a TLBI for the non-overlapped PTEs of the block.
>
> But is not splitting the TLBI flush responsibility between the callers
> (intermediate blocks) and the platform API (contpte-edges) - some what
> problematic from a semantics perspective, and will be more susceptible
> for missing TLB flushes etc ?
I seem to agree that this is a semantic problem. Although, we won't ever
miss a TLB flush - we will only have extras. It is the responsibility of
the caller to do the TLBI, the platform API is only checking whether we
need some more TLBIs.
>
>> I'll explain some more in the changelog next version.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++++
>>>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>>> include/linux/pgtable.h | 4 ++++
>>>> mm/pgtable-generic.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>>>> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> index 2a77f11b78d5..8872ea5f0642 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>> @@ -1553,6 +1553,11 @@ extern void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>>>> pte_t old_pte, pte_t new_pte);
>>>> +#define modify_prot_start_ptes modify_prot_start_ptes
>>>> +extern pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>>>> + unsigned int nr);
>>>> +
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_CONTPTE
>>>> /*
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>>> index 8fcf59ba39db..fe60be8774f4 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>>> @@ -1523,7 +1523,8 @@ static int __init prevent_bootmem_remove_init(void)
>>>> early_initcall(prevent_bootmem_remove_init);
>>>> #endif
>>>> -pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>>>> +pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>>>> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
>>>> {
>>>> if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2645198)) {
>>>> /*
>>>> @@ -1532,9 +1533,14 @@ pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte
>>>> * in cases where cpu is affected with errata #2645198.
>>>> */
>>>> if (pte_user_exec(ptep_get(ptep)))
>>>> - return ptep_clear_flush(vma, addr, ptep);
>>>> + return clear_flush_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, nr);
>>>> }
>>>> - return ptep_get_and_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
>>>> + return get_and_clear_full_ptes(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, nr, 0);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +pte_t ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return modify_prot_start_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, 1);
>>>> }
>>>> void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> index ed287289335f..10cdb87ccecf 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>>>> @@ -828,6 +828,10 @@ extern pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> pte_t *ptep);
>>>> #endif
>>>> +extern pte_t clear_flush_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> + unsigned long address,
>>>> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr);
>>>> +
>>>> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PMDP_HUGE_CLEAR_FLUSH
>>>> extern pmd_t pmdp_huge_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> unsigned long address,
>>>> diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>>>> index 5a882f2b10f9..e238f88c3cac 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
>>>> @@ -90,17 +90,23 @@ int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>> -#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_FLUSH
>>>> -pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>>> - pte_t *ptep)
>>>> +pte_t clear_flush_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>>> + pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr)
>>>> {
>>>> struct mm_struct *mm = (vma)->vm_mm;
>>>> pte_t pte;
>>>> - pte = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, ptep);
>>>> + pte = get_and_clear_full_ptes(mm, address, ptep, nr, 0);
>>>> if (pte_accessible(mm, pte))
>>>> - flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
>>>> + flush_tlb_range(vma, address, address + nr * PAGE_SIZE);
>>>> return pte;
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_CLEAR_FLUSH
>>>> +pte_t ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>>> + pte_t *ptep)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return clear_flush_ptes(vma, address, ptep, 1);
>>>> +}
>>>> #endif
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 5:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Dev Jain
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: Refactor code in mprotect Dev Jain
2025-04-29 6:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29 6:54 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 11:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-04-29 7:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29 8:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 13:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 6:37 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 13:18 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-30 13:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-04-29 8:39 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29 9:01 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 13:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 6:25 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 14:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 14:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-06 15:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 14:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-30 14:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-01 11:33 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-01 12:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 14:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30 5:35 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-30 5:45 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-30 14:16 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start Dev Jain
2025-04-30 5:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-30 5:49 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 6:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-30 6:32 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit Dev Jain
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable() Dev Jain
2025-04-29 9:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 9:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 13:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30 5:44 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-06 9:16 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-06 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30 6:17 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching Dev Jain
2025-04-29 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Lance Yang
2025-04-29 9:02 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 10:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 5:42 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 6:22 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-30 7:07 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 11:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 14:02 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9856f39d-d9d8-45c1-8e5a-514d21a86d51@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox