linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	david@kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	harry.yoo@oracle.com, yosry.ahmed@linux.dev,
	imran.f.khan@oracle.com, kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com,
	axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
	chenridong@huaweicloud.com, mkoutny@suse.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com,
	apais@linux.microsoft.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, bhe@redhat.com,
	usamaarif642@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 29/32] mm: memcontrol: prepare for reparenting non-hierarchical stats
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 11:11:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <97e296ed-ef73-44b7-ab68-3d79749caa47@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO9r8zPmgytmGHAbueFKXcZWY5SJaEwD3Pqk99ws4XeO2_hnKw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Yosry,

On 2/26/26 11:16 PM, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>>> Did you measure the impact of making state_local atomic on the flush
>>> path? It's a slow path but we've seen pain from it being too slow
>>> before, because it extends the critical section of the rstat flush
>>> lock.
>>
>> Qi, please measure the impact on flushing and if no impact then no need to do
>> anything as I don't want anymore churn in this series.
>>
>>>
>>> Can we keep this non-atomic and use mod_memcg_lruvec_state() here? It
>>> will update the stat on the local counter and it will be added to
>>> state_local in the flush path when needed. We can even force another
>>> flush in reparent_state_local () after reparenting is completed, if we
>>> want to avoid leaving a potentially large stat update pending, as it
>>> can be missed by mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited().
>>>
>>> Same for reparent_memcg_state_local(), we can probably use mod_memcg_state()?
>>
>> Yosry, do you mind sending the patch you are thinking about over this series?
> 
> Honestly, I'd rather squash it into this patch if possible. It avoids
> churn in the history (switch to atomics and back), and is arguably
> simpler than checking for regressions in the flush path.
> 
> What I have in mind is the diff below (build tested only). Qi, would
> you be able to test this? It applies directly on this patch in mm-new:

Thank you so much for doing this! I'm willing to squash and test.

And I found some issues with the diff:

> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index d82dbfcc28057..404565e80cbf3 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -234,11 +234,18 @@ static inline void reparent_state_local(struct
> mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgr
>          if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
>                  return;
> 
> +       /*
> +        * Reparent stats exposed non-hierarchically. Flush @memcg's
> stats first to
> +        * read its stats accurately , and conservatively flush @parent's stats
> +        * after reparenting to avoid hiding a potentially large stat update
> +        * (e.g. from callers of mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited()).
> +        */
>          __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(memcg, true);
> 
> -       /* The following counts are all non-hierarchical and need to
> be reparented. */
>          reparent_memcg1_state_local(memcg, parent);
>          reparent_memcg1_lruvec_state_local(memcg, parent);
> +
> +       __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(parent, true);
>   }
>   #else
>   static inline void reparent_state_local(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> struct mem_cgroup *parent)
> @@ -442,7 +449,7 @@ struct lruvec_stats {
>          long state[NR_MEMCG_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
> 
>          /* Non-hierarchical (CPU aggregated) state */
> -       atomic_long_t state_local[NR_MEMCG_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
> +       long state_local[NR_MEMCG_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
> 
>          /* Pending child counts during tree propagation */
>          long state_pending[NR_MEMCG_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
> @@ -485,7 +492,7 @@ unsigned long lruvec_page_state_local(struct lruvec *lruvec,
>                  return 0;
> 
>          pn = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
> -       x = atomic_long_read(&(pn->lruvec_stats->state_local[i]));
> +       x = READ_ONCE(pn->lruvec_stats->state_local[i]);
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>          if (x < 0)
>                  x = 0;
> @@ -493,6 +500,10 @@ unsigned long lruvec_page_state_local(struct
> lruvec *lruvec,
>          return x;
>   }
> 
> +static void mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> +                                  enum node_stat_item idx,
> +                                  int val);
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
>   void reparent_memcg_lruvec_state_local(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                                         struct mem_cgroup *parent, int idx)
> @@ -506,12 +517,10 @@ void reparent_memcg_lruvec_state_local(struct
> mem_cgroup *memcg,
>          for_each_node(nid) {
>                  struct lruvec *child_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg,
> NODE_DATA(nid));
>                  struct lruvec *parent_lruvec =
> mem_cgroup_lruvec(parent, NODE_DATA(nid));
> -               struct mem_cgroup_per_node *parent_pn;
>                  unsigned long value =
> lruvec_page_state_local(child_lruvec, idx);
> 
> -               parent_pn = container_of(parent_lruvec, struct
> mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
> -
> -               atomic_long_add(value,
> &(parent_pn->lruvec_stats->state_local[i]));
> +               mod_memcg_lruvec_state(child_lruvec, idx, -value);

We can't use mod_memcg_lruvec_state() here, because child memcg has
already been set CSS_DYING. So in mod_memcg_lruvec_state(), we will
get parent memcg.

It seems we need to reimplement a function or add a parameter to
mod_memcg_lruvec_state() to solve the problem. What do you think?

> +               mod_memcg_lruvec_state(parent_lruvec, idx, value);
>          }
>   }
>   #endif
> @@ -598,7 +607,7 @@ struct memcg_vmstats {
>          unsigned long           events[NR_MEMCG_EVENTS];
> 
>          /* Non-hierarchical (CPU aggregated) page state & events */
> -       atomic_long_t           state_local[MEMCG_VMSTAT_SIZE];
> +       long                    state_local[MEMCG_VMSTAT_SIZE];
>          unsigned long           events_local[NR_MEMCG_EVENTS];
> 
>          /* Pending child counts during tree propagation */
> @@ -835,7 +844,7 @@ unsigned long memcg_page_state_local(struct
> mem_cgroup *memcg, int idx)
>          if (WARN_ONCE(BAD_STAT_IDX(i), "%s: missing stat item %d\n",
> __func__, idx))
>                  return 0;
> 
> -       x = atomic_long_read(&(memcg->vmstats->state_local[i]));
> +       x = READ_ONCE(memcg->vmstats->state_local[i]);
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>          if (x < 0)
>                  x = 0;
> @@ -852,7 +861,8 @@ void reparent_memcg_state_local(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>          if (WARN_ONCE(BAD_STAT_IDX(i), "%s: missing stat item %d\n",
> __func__, idx))
>                  return;
> 
> -       atomic_long_add(value, &(parent->vmstats->state_local[i]));
> +       mod_memcg_state(memcg, idx, -value);

Same as mod_memcg_lruvec_state().

Thanks,
Qi

> +       mod_memcg_state(parent, idx, value);
>   }
>   #endif
> 
> @@ -4174,8 +4184,6 @@ struct aggregate_control {
>          long *aggregate;
>          /* pointer to the non-hierarchichal (CPU aggregated) counters */
>          long *local;
> -       /* pointer to the atomic non-hierarchichal (CPU aggregated) counters */
> -       atomic_long_t *alocal;
>          /* pointer to the pending child counters during tree propagation */
>          long *pending;
>          /* pointer to the parent's pending counters, could be NULL */
> @@ -4213,12 +4221,8 @@ static void mem_cgroup_stat_aggregate(struct
> aggregate_control *ac)
>                  }
> 
>                  /* Aggregate counts on this level and propagate upwards */
> -               if (delta_cpu) {
> -                       if (ac->local)
> -                               ac->local[i] += delta_cpu;
> -                       else if (ac->alocal)
> -                               atomic_long_add(delta_cpu, &(ac->alocal[i]));
> -               }
> +               if (delta_cpu)
> +                       ac->local[i] += delta_cpu;
> 
>                  if (delta) {
>                          ac->aggregate[i] += delta;
> @@ -4289,8 +4293,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush(struct
> cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
> 
>          ac = (struct aggregate_control) {
>                  .aggregate = memcg->vmstats->state,
> -               .local = NULL,
> -               .alocal = memcg->vmstats->state_local,
> +               .local = memcg->vmstats->state_local,
>                  .pending = memcg->vmstats->state_pending,
>                  .ppending = parent ? parent->vmstats->state_pending : NULL,
>                  .cstat = statc->state,
> @@ -4323,8 +4326,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush(struct
> cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
> 
>                  ac = (struct aggregate_control) {
>                          .aggregate = lstats->state,
> -                       .local = NULL,
> -                       .alocal = lstats->state_local,
> +                       .local = lstats->state_local,
>                          .pending = lstats->state_pending,
>                          .ppending = plstats ? plstats->state_pending : NULL,
>                          .cstat = lstatc->state,



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-27  3:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-25  7:48 [PATCH v5 00/32] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/32] mm: memcontrol: remove dead code of checking parent memory cgroup Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/32] mm: workingset: use folio_lruvec() in workingset_refault() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/32] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec_irq and its variants Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/32] mm: vmscan: prepare for the refactoring the move_folios_to_lru() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/32] mm: vmscan: refactor move_folios_to_lru() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/32] mm: memcontrol: allocate object cgroup for non-kmem case Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/32] mm: memcontrol: return root object cgroup for root memory cgroup Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/32] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in get_mem_cgroup_from_folio() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/32] buffer: prevent memory cgroup release in folio_alloc_buffers() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/32] writeback: prevent memory cgroup release in writeback module Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/32] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in count_memcg_folio_events() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/32] mm: page_io: prevent memory cgroup release in page_io module Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:52 ` [PATCH v5 13/32] mm: migrate: prevent memory cgroup release in folio_migrate_mapping() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:52 ` [PATCH v5 14/32] mm: mglru: prevent memory cgroup release in mglru Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:52 ` [PATCH v5 15/32] mm: memcontrol: prevent memory cgroup release in mem_cgroup_swap_full() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:52 ` [PATCH v5 16/32] mm: workingset: prevent memory cgroup release in lru_gen_eviction() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 17/32] mm: thp: prevent memory cgroup release in folio_split_queue_lock{_irqsave}() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 18/32] mm: zswap: prevent memory cgroup release in zswap_compress() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 19/32] mm: workingset: prevent lruvec release in workingset_refault() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 20/32] mm: zswap: prevent lruvec release in zswap_folio_swapin() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 21/32] mm: swap: prevent lruvec release in lru_gen_clear_refs() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 22/32] mm: workingset: prevent lruvec release in workingset_activation() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 23/32] mm: do not open-code lruvec lock Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 24/32] mm: memcontrol: prepare for reparenting LRU pages for " Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 25/32] mm: vmscan: prepare for reparenting traditional LRU folios Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 26/32] mm: vmscan: prepare for reparenting MGLRU folios Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 27/32] mm: memcontrol: refactor memcg_reparent_objcgs() Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 28/32] mm: workingset: use lruvec_lru_size() to get the number of lru pages Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 29/32] mm: memcontrol: prepare for reparenting non-hierarchical stats Qi Zheng
2026-02-25 14:58   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-02-26  0:25     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-26  6:42       ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-26 15:16       ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-02-26 17:02         ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-26 17:13           ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-02-27  3:11         ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2026-02-26  6:41     ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-26  1:41   ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-26  6:45     ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 30/32] mm: memcontrol: convert objcg to be per-memcg per-node type Qi Zheng
2026-02-25  9:44   ` [PATCH v5 update " Qi Zheng
2026-02-26  2:27     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-26  6:47       ` Qi Zheng
2026-02-26 20:05     ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 31/32] mm: memcontrol: eliminate the problem of dying memory cgroup for LRU folios Qi Zheng
2026-02-26  2:40   ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-25  7:53 ` [PATCH v5 32/32] mm: lru: add VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO to lru maintenance helpers Qi Zheng
2026-02-25 21:57 ` [PATCH v5 00/32] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup Andrew Morton
2026-02-27  0:24   ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=97e296ed-ef73-44b7-ab68-3d79749caa47@linux.dev \
    --to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox