From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Chris Kennelly" <ckennelly@google.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Hugepage collapse in process context
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:53:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97A31D94-671B-4400-8114-9039B28E54A7@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YC4nx/qChwNdfLmB@dhcp22.suse.cz>
> On Feb 18, 2021, at 12:39 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu 18-02-21 08:11:13, Song Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 16, 2021, at 8:24 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> Khugepaged is slow by default, it scans at most 4096 pages every 10s.
>>> That's normally fine as a system-wide setting, but some applications would
>>> benefit from a more aggressive approach (as long as they are willing to
>>> pay for it).
>>>
>>> Instead of adding priorities for eligible ranges of memory to khugepaged,
>>> temporarily speeding khugepaged up for the whole system, or sharding its
>>> work for memory belonging to a certain process, one approach would be to
>>> allow userspace to induce hugepage collapse.
>>>
>>> The benefit to this approach would be that this is done in process context
>>> so its cpu is charged to the process that is inducing the collapse.
>>> Khugepaged is not involved.
>>>
>>> Idea was to allow userspace to induce hugepage collapse through the new
>>> process_madvise() call. This allows us to collapse hugepages on behalf of
>>> current or another process for a vectored set of ranges.
>>>
>>> This could be done through a new process_madvise() mode *or* it could be a
>>> flag to MADV_HUGEPAGE since process_madvise() allows for a flag parameter
>>> to be passed. For example, MADV_F_SYNC.
>>>
>>> When done, this madvise call would allocate a hugepage on the right node
>>> and attempt to do the collapse in process context just as khugepaged would
>>> otherwise do.
>>
>> This is very interesting idea. One question, IIUC, the user process will
>> block until all small pages in given ranges are collapsed into THPs.
>
> Do you mean that PF would be blocked due to exclusive mmap_sem? Or is
> there anything else oyu have in mind?
I was thinking about memory defragmentation when the application asks for
many THPs. Say the application looks like
main()
{
malloc();
madvise(HUGE);
process_madvise();
/* start doing work */
}
IIUC, when process_madvise() finishes, the THPs should be ready. However,
if defragmentation takes a long time, the process will wait in process_madvise().
Thanks,
Song
>
>> What
>> would happen if the memory is so fragmented that we cannot allocate that
>> many huge pages? Do we need some fail over mechanisms?
>
> IIRC khugepaged preallocates pages without holding any locks and I would
> expect the same will be done for madvise as well.
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 4:24 David Rientjes
2021-02-17 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18 13:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-18 13:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-18 22:34 ` David Rientjes
2021-02-19 16:16 ` Zi Yan
2021-02-24 9:44 ` Alex Shi
2021-03-01 20:56 ` David Rientjes
2021-03-04 10:52 ` Alex Shi
2021-02-17 15:49 ` Zi Yan
2021-02-18 8:11 ` Song Liu
2021-02-18 8:39 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18 9:53 ` Song Liu [this message]
2021-02-18 10:01 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97A31D94-671B-4400-8114-9039B28E54A7@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ckennelly@google.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox