linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Chris Kennelly" <ckennelly@google.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Hugepage collapse in process context
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:53:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <97A31D94-671B-4400-8114-9039B28E54A7@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YC4nx/qChwNdfLmB@dhcp22.suse.cz>



> On Feb 18, 2021, at 12:39 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu 18-02-21 08:11:13, Song Liu wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 16, 2021, at 8:24 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everybody,
>>> 
>>> Khugepaged is slow by default, it scans at most 4096 pages every 10s.  
>>> That's normally fine as a system-wide setting, but some applications would 
>>> benefit from a more aggressive approach (as long as they are willing to 
>>> pay for it).
>>> 
>>> Instead of adding priorities for eligible ranges of memory to khugepaged, 
>>> temporarily speeding khugepaged up for the whole system, or sharding its 
>>> work for memory belonging to a certain process, one approach would be to 
>>> allow userspace to induce hugepage collapse.
>>> 
>>> The benefit to this approach would be that this is done in process context 
>>> so its cpu is charged to the process that is inducing the collapse.  
>>> Khugepaged is not involved.
>>> 
>>> Idea was to allow userspace to induce hugepage collapse through the new 
>>> process_madvise() call.  This allows us to collapse hugepages on behalf of 
>>> current or another process for a vectored set of ranges.
>>> 
>>> This could be done through a new process_madvise() mode *or* it could be a 
>>> flag to MADV_HUGEPAGE since process_madvise() allows for a flag parameter 
>>> to be passed.  For example, MADV_F_SYNC.
>>> 
>>> When done, this madvise call would allocate a hugepage on the right node 
>>> and attempt to do the collapse in process context just as khugepaged would 
>>> otherwise do.
>> 
>> This is very interesting idea. One question, IIUC, the user process will 
>> block until all small pages in given ranges are collapsed into THPs.
> 
> Do you mean that PF would be blocked due to exclusive mmap_sem? Or is
> there anything else oyu have in mind?

I was thinking about memory defragmentation when the application asks for
many THPs. Say the application looks like

main()
{
	malloc();
	madvise(HUGE);
	process_madvise();
	
	/* start doing work */
}

IIUC, when process_madvise() finishes, the THPs should be ready. However, 
if defragmentation takes a long time, the process will wait in process_madvise().

Thanks,
Song


> 
>> What 
>> would happen if the memory is so fragmented that we cannot allocate that 
>> many huge pages? Do we need some fail over mechanisms? 
> 
> IIRC khugepaged preallocates pages without holding any locks and I would
> expect the same will be done for madvise as well.
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-17  4:24 David Rientjes
2021-02-17  8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18 13:43   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-18 13:52     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-18 22:34       ` David Rientjes
2021-02-19 16:16         ` Zi Yan
2021-02-24  9:44         ` Alex Shi
2021-03-01 20:56           ` David Rientjes
2021-03-04 10:52             ` Alex Shi
2021-02-17 15:49 ` Zi Yan
2021-02-18  8:11 ` Song Liu
2021-02-18  8:39   ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-18  9:53     ` Song Liu [this message]
2021-02-18 10:01       ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=97A31D94-671B-4400-8114-9039B28E54A7@fb.com \
    --to=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ckennelly@google.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox