From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE in pin_user_pages()
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 18:47:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97970ae6-e912-912a-1755-8d7bbb1131d0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230525155102.87353-2-dhowells@redhat.com>
On 25.05.23 17:51, David Howells wrote:
> Make pin_user_pages*() leave the ZERO_PAGE unpinned if it extracts a
> pointer to it from the page tables and make unpin_user_page*()
> correspondingly ignore the ZERO_PAGE when unpinning. We don't want to risk
> overrunning the zero page's refcount as we're only allowed ~2 million pins
> on it - something that userspace can conceivably trigger.
>
As Linus raised, the ZERO_PAGE(0) checks should probably be
is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page)).
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
> cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
> cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index bbe416236593..d2662aa8cf01 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ static inline void sanity_check_pinned_pages(struct page **pages,
> struct page *page = *pages;
> struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
>
> - if (!folio_test_anon(folio))
> + if (page == ZERO_PAGE(0) ||
> + !folio_test_anon(folio))
> continue;
> if (!folio_test_large(folio) || folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnonExclusive(&folio->page), page);
> @@ -131,6 +132,13 @@ struct folio *try_grab_folio(struct page *page, int refs, unsigned int flags)
> else if (flags & FOLL_PIN) {
> struct folio *folio;
>
> + /*
> + * Don't take a pin on the zero page - it's not going anywhere
> + * and it is used in a *lot* of places.
> + */
> + if (page == ZERO_PAGE(0))
> + return page_folio(ZERO_PAGE(0));
With the fixed check, this should be
return page_folio(page);
I guess.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-25 15:50 [RFC PATCH 0/3] block: Make old dio use iov_iter_extract_pages() and page pinning David Howells
2023-05-25 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE in pin_user_pages() David Howells
2023-05-25 16:47 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-05-25 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: Provide a function to get an additional pin on a page David Howells
2023-05-25 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] block: Use iov_iter_extract_pages() and page pinning in direct-io.c David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97970ae6-e912-912a-1755-8d7bbb1131d0@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox