From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, willy@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.or
Subject: Re: [v1 0/5] parallelized "struct page" zeroing
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:15:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9726f05e-7752-0214-1661-f69a689d8d46@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c399ad8b-32d8-09d7-bb47-dd6bc528b133@oracle.com>
On 03/23/2017 07:47 PM, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>>>
>>> How long does it take if we just don't zero this memory at all? We seem
>>> to be initialising most of struct page in __init_single_page(), so it
>>> seems like a lot of additional complexity to conditionally zero the rest
>>> of struct page.
>>
>> Alternatively, just zero out the entire vmemmap area when it is setup
>> in the kernel page tables.
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I can do this, either way is fine with me. It would be a little slower
> compared to the current approach where we benefit from having memset()
> to work as prefetch. But that would become negligible, once in the
> future we will increase the granularity of multi-threading, currently it
> is only one thread per-mnode to multithread vmemamp. Your call.
>
> Thank you,
> Pasha
Hi Dave and Matthew,
I've been thinking about it some more, and figured that the current
approach is better:
1. Most importantly: Part of the vmemmap is initialized early during
boot to support Linux to get to the multi-CPU environment. This means
that we would need to figure out what part of vmemmap will need to be
zeroed before hand in single thread, than zero the rest in multi-thread.
This will be very awkward architecturally and error prone.
2. As I already showed, the current approach is significantly faster.
So, perhaps it should be the default behavior even for non-deferred
"struct page" initialization: unconditionally do not zero vmemmap in
memblock allocator, and always zero in __init_single_page(). But, I am
afraid it could cause boot time regressions on some platforms where
memset() is not optimized, so I would not do it in this patchset. But,
hopefully, gradually more platforms will support deferred struct page
initialization, and this would become the default behavior.
3. By zeroing "struct page" in __init_single_page(), we set every byte
of "struct page" in one place instead of scattering it across different
places. So, it could help in the future when we will multi-thread
addition of hotplugged memory.
Thank you,
Pasha
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 23:01 Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 1/5] sparc64: simplify vmemmap_populate Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 2/5] mm: defining memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 3/5] mm: add "zero" argument to vmemmap allocators Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 4/5] mm: zero struct pages during initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:01 ` [v1 5/5] mm: teach platforms not to zero struct pages memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-03-23 23:26 ` [v1 0/5] parallelized "struct page" zeroing Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-23 23:35 ` David Miller
2017-03-23 23:47 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-03-24 1:15 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2017-03-23 23:36 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-03-24 8:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-03-24 9:35 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9726f05e-7752-0214-1661-f69a689d8d46@oracle.com \
--to=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.or \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox