From: Burt Holzman <burt@fnal.gov>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: "hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"vdavydov.dev@gmail.com" <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: OOM notification for cgroupsv1 broken in 4.19
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 17:33:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96D4815C-420F-41B7-B1E9-A741E7523596@services.fnal.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181221153302.GB6410@dhcp22.suse.cz>
> On Dec 21, 2018, at 9:33 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri 21-12-18 14:49:38, Burt Holzman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch: 29ef680ae7c21110af8e6416d84d8a72fc147b14
>> [PATCH] memcg, oom: move out_of_memory back to the charge path
>>
>> has broken the eventfd notification for cgroups-v1. This is because
>> mem_cgroup_oom_notify() is called only in mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize and
>> not with the new, additional call to mem_cgroup_out_of_memory in the
>> charge path.
>
> Yes, you are right and this is a clear regression. Does the following
> patch fixes the issue for you? I am not super happy about the code
> duplication but I wasn't able to separate this out from
> mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize because that one has to handle the oom_killer
> disabled case which is not the case in the charge path because we simply
> back off and hand over to mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize in that case.
Hi Michal,
Thanks for the quick response & patch. I can confirm that with this patch the notification is working for my sample test case.
- B
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-21 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-21 14:49 Burt Holzman
2018-12-21 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-21 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-21 17:33 ` Burt Holzman [this message]
2018-12-21 19:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-12-24 9:11 ` [PATCH] memcg, oom: notify on oom killer invocation from the charge path Michal Hocko
2018-12-24 9:11 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96D4815C-420F-41B7-B1E9-A741E7523596@services.fnal.gov \
--to=burt@fnal.gov \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox