From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDF76B003A for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p9so811142lbv.19 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 04:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.parallels.com (relay.parallels.com. [195.214.232.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ww4si3525779lbb.162.2013.12.16.04.17.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 04:17:23 -0800 (PST) From: Vladimir Davydov Subject: [PATCH v14 13/18] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:17:02 +0400 Message-ID: <9645eb409c9cf01a249b100d2ff0d7dff12deedb.1387193771.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: dchinner@redhat.com, mhocko@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, glommer@openvz.org, glommer@gmail.com, Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel From: Glauber Costa In very low free kernel memory situations, it may be the case that we have less objects to free than our initial batch size. If this is the case, it is better to shrink those, and open space for the new workload then to keep them and fail the new allocations. In particular, we are concerned with the direct reclaim case for memcg. Although this same technique can be applied to other situations just as well, we will start conservative and apply it for that case, which is the one that matters the most. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Dave Chinner Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Rik van Riel --- mm/vmscan.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 67c1950..95fd2c3 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -281,17 +281,22 @@ shrink_slab_node(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl, struct shrinker *shrinker, nr_pages_scanned, lru_pages, max_pass, delta, total_scan); - while (total_scan >= batch_size) { + while (total_scan > 0) { unsigned long ret; + unsigned long nr_to_scan = min(batch_size, total_scan); - shrinkctl->nr_to_scan = batch_size; + if (!shrinkctl->target_mem_cgroup && + total_scan < batch_size) + break; + + shrinkctl->nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan; ret = shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl); if (ret == SHRINK_STOP) break; freed += ret; - count_vm_events(SLABS_SCANNED, batch_size); - total_scan -= batch_size; + count_vm_events(SLABS_SCANNED, nr_to_scan); + total_scan -= nr_to_scan; cond_resched(); } -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org