linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	brouer@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfree_rcu() should use the new kfree_bulk() interface for freeing rcu structures
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:42:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96438a42-9510-444b-f90e-ed4e12f356c9@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171219191222.GA6515@bombadil.infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2010 bytes --]



On 12/19/2017 11:12 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:52:27AM -0800, rao.shoaib@oracle.com wrote:
>> This patch updates kfree_rcu to use new bulk memory free functions as they
>> are more efficient. It also moves kfree_call_rcu() out of rcu related code to
>> mm/slab_common.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/mm.h |   5 ++
>>   kernel/rcu/tree.c  |  14 ----
>>   kernel/sysctl.c    |  40 +++++++++++
>>   mm/slab.h          |  23 +++++++
>>   mm/slab_common.c   | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   5 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> You've added an awful lot of code.  Do you have any performance measurements
> that shows this to be a win?
I did some micro benchmarking when I was developing the code and did see 
performance gains -- see attached.

I tried several networking benchmarks but was not able to get any 
improvement . The reason is that these benchmarks do not exercise the 
code we are improving. So I looked at the kernel source for users ofA  
kfree_rcu().A  It turns out that directory deletion code callsA  kfree_rcu 
to free the data structure when an entry is deleted. Based on that I 
created two benchmarks.

1) make_dirs -- This benchmark creates multi level directory structure 
and than deletes it. It's the delete partA  where we see the performance 
gain of about 8.3%. The creation time remains same.

This benchmark was derived from fdtree benchmark at 
https://computing.llnl.gov/?set=code&page=sio_downloads ==> 
https://github.com/llnl/fdtree

2) tsock -- I also noticed that a socket has an entry in a directory and 
when the socket is closed the directory entry is deleted. So I wrote a 
simple benchmark that goes in a loop a million times and opens and 
closes 10 sockets per iteration. This shows an improvement of 7.6%

I have attached the benchmarks and results. Unchanged results are for 
stock kernel, Changed are for the modified kernel.

Shoaib

[-- Attachment #2: make_dirs.tar --]
[-- Type: application/x-tar, Size: 10240 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: tsock.tar --]
[-- Type: application/x-tar, Size: 10240 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-19 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-19 17:52 rao.shoaib
2017-12-19 19:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 19:42   ` Rao Shoaib [this message]
2017-12-19 19:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 19:56   ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-19 20:22     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-19 19:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-19 19:33 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-19 20:02   ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-20  0:56     ` Christopher Lameter
2017-12-20 18:14       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-20 14:17     ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-19 20:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-19 20:56   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-19 21:20   ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-20  7:31     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-19 22:12   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-19 23:25     ` Rao Shoaib
2017-12-20  0:20     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-20  1:53       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-20  5:19         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-20  7:06       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96438a42-9510-444b-f90e-ed4e12f356c9@oracle.com \
    --to=rao.shoaib@oracle.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox