Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfs: Fix missing zero-length check in unbuffered write

["Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>]

On 29.01.24 10:49, David Howells wrote:
> Fix netfs_unbuffered_write_iter() to return immediately if
> generic_write_checks() returns 0, indicating there's nothing to write.
> Note that netfs_file_write_iter() already does this.
> 
> Also, whilst we're at it, put in checks for the size being zero before we
> even take the locks.  Note that generic_write_checks() can still reduce the
> size to zero, so we still need that check.
> 
> Without this, a warning similar to the following is logged to dmesg:
> 
> 	netfs: Zero-sized write [R=1b6da]
> 
> and the syscall fails with EIO, e.g.:
> 
> 	/sbin/ldconfig.real: Writing of cache extension data failed: Input/output error
> 
> This can be reproduced on 9p by:
> 
> 	xfs_io -f -c 'pwrite 0 0' /xfstest.test/foo
> 
> Fixes: 153a9961b551 ("netfs: Implement unbuffered/DIO write support")
> Reported-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZbQUU6QKmIftKsmo@FV7GG9FTHL/

David, thx for fixing Eric's regression, which I'm tracking.

Christian, just wondering: that patch afaics is sitting in vfs.netfs for
about three weeks now -- is that intentional or did it maybe fell
through the cracks somehow?

> [...]

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.