From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Jan Hendrik Farr <kernel@jfarr.cc>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] slab: Introduce kmalloc_obj() and family
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:01:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <960729bb-0746-4709-a40c-2e254f963deb@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251203233036.3212363-1-kees@kernel.org>
On 12/4/25 00:30, Kees Cook wrote:
> Introduce type-aware kmalloc-family helpers to replace the common
> idioms for single object and arrays of objects allocation:
>
> ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*ptr), gfp);
> ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct some_obj_name), gfp);
> ptr = kzalloc(sizeof(*ptr), gfp);
> ptr = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*ptr), gfp);
> ptr = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*ptr), gfp);
>
> These become, respectively:
>
> ptr = kmalloc_obj(*ptr, gfp);
> ptr = kmalloc_obj(*ptr, gfp);
> ptr = kzalloc_obj(*ptr, gfp);
> ptr = kmalloc_objs(*ptr, count, gfp);
> ptr = kzalloc_objs(*ptr, count, gfp);
>
> Beyond the other benefits outlined below, the primary ergonomic benefit
> is the elimination of needing "sizeof" nor the type name, and the
> enforcement of assignment types (they do not return "void *", but rather
> a pointer to the type of the first argument). The type name _can_ be
> used, though, in the case where an assignment is indirect (e.g. via
> "return"). This additionally allows[1] variables to be declared via
> __auto_type:
>
> __auto_type ptr = kmalloc_obj(struct foo, gfp);
>
> Internal introspection of the allocated type now becomes possible,
> allowing for future alignment-aware choices to be made by the allocator
> and future hardening work that can be type sensitive. For example,
> adding __alignof(*ptr) as an argument to the internal allocators so that
> appropriate/efficient alignment choices can be made, or being able to
> correctly choose per-allocation offset randomization within a bucket
> that does not break alignment requirements.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiCOTW5UftUrAnvJkr6769D29tF7Of79gUjdQHS_TkF5A@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
How do you plan to handle this series? Given minimal slab changes (just
wrappers) but there being also changes elsewhere, want to use your hardening
tree? I wouldn't mind.
> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #ifndef _LINUX_SLAB_H
> #define _LINUX_SLAB_H
>
> +#include <linux/bug.h>
> #include <linux/cache.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/overflow.h>
> @@ -965,6 +966,63 @@ static __always_inline __alloc_size(1) void *kmalloc_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t f
> void *kmalloc_nolock_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t gfp_flags, int node);
> #define kmalloc_nolock(...) alloc_hooks(kmalloc_nolock_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>
> +/**
> + * __alloc_objs - Allocate objects of a given type using
> + * @KMALLOC: which size-based kmalloc wrapper to allocate with.
> + * @GFP: GFP flags for the allocation.
> + * @TYPE: type to allocate space for.
> + * @COUNT: how many @TYPE objects to allocate.
> + *
> + * Returns: Newly allocated pointer to (first) @TYPE of @COUNT-many
> + * allocated @TYPE objects, or NULL on failure.
> + */
> +#define __alloc_objs(KMALLOC, GFP, TYPE, COUNT) \
> +({ \
> + const size_t __obj_size = size_mul(sizeof(TYPE), COUNT); \
I assume with the hardcoded 1 for COUNT, this size_mul() will be eliminated
by the compiler and not add unnecessary runtime overhead? Otherwise we
should have two core #define variants.
I also noted that the existing kmalloc_array() and kvmalloc_array() do
check_mul_overflow() and return NULL silently on overflow. This AFAIU will
make SIZE_MAX passed to the underlying kmalloc/kvmalloc and thus will cause
a warning. That's IMHO a good thing.
> + (TYPE *)KMALLOC(__obj_size, GFP); \
> +})
> +
> +/**
> + * kmalloc_obj - Allocate a single instance of the given type
> + * @VAR_OR_TYPE: Variable or type to allocate.
> + * @GFP: GFP flags for the allocation.
> + *
> + * Returns: newly allocated pointer to a @VAR_OR_TYPE on success, or NULL
> + * on failure.
> + */
> +#define kmalloc_obj(VAR_OR_TYPE, GFP) \
> + __alloc_objs(kmalloc, GFP, typeof(VAR_OR_TYPE), 1)
> +
> +/**
> + * kmalloc_objs - Allocate an array of the given type
> + * @VAR_OR_TYPE: Variable or type to allocate an array of.
> + * @COUNT: How many elements in the array.
> + * @FLAGS: GFP flags for the allocation.
> + *
> + * Returns: newly allocated pointer to array of @VAR_OR_TYPE on success,
> + * or NULL on failure.
> + */
> +#define kmalloc_objs(VAR_OR_TYPE, COUNT, GFP) \
> + __alloc_objs(kmalloc, GFP, typeof(VAR_OR_TYPE), COUNT)
> +
> +/* All kzalloc aliases for kmalloc_(obj|objs|flex). */
> +#define kzalloc_obj(P, GFP) \
> + __alloc_objs(kzalloc, GFP, typeof(P), 1)
> +#define kzalloc_objs(P, COUNT, GFP) \
> + __alloc_objs(kzalloc, GFP, typeof(P), COUNT)
> +
> +/* All kvmalloc aliases for kmalloc_(obj|objs|flex). */
> +#define kvmalloc_obj(P, GFP) \
> + __alloc_objs(kvmalloc, GFP, typeof(P), 1)
> +#define kvmalloc_objs(P, COUNT, GFP) \
> + __alloc_objs(kvmalloc, GFP, typeof(P), COUNT)
> +
> +/* All kvzalloc aliases for kmalloc_(obj|objs|flex). */
> +#define kvzalloc_obj(P, GFP) \
> + __alloc_objs(kvzalloc, GFP, typeof(P), 1)
> +#define kvzalloc_objs(P, COUNT, GFP) \
> + __alloc_objs(kvzalloc, GFP, typeof(P), COUNT)
> +
> #define kmem_buckets_alloc(_b, _size, _flags) \
> alloc_hooks(__kmalloc_node_noprof(PASS_BUCKET_PARAMS(_size, _b), _flags, NUMA_NO_NODE))
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-08 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-03 23:30 [PATCH v6 0/5] asdf Kees Cook
2025-12-03 23:30 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] slab: Introduce kmalloc_obj() and family Kees Cook
2026-01-08 14:01 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2026-01-08 17:15 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-09 17:31 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-09 17:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-03 23:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] checkpatch: Suggest kmalloc_obj family for sizeof allocations Kees Cook
2025-12-03 23:30 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] compiler_types: Introduce __flex_counter() and family Kees Cook
2025-12-04 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-04 20:25 ` Kees Cook
2025-12-03 23:30 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] slab: Introduce kmalloc_flex() " Kees Cook
2026-01-08 14:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-08 17:12 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-08 17:40 ` Kees Cook
2026-01-09 17:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-03 23:30 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] coccinelle: Add kmalloc_objs conversion script Kees Cook
2025-12-11 14:15 ` Markus Elfring
2025-12-11 22:02 ` Kees Cook
2025-12-16 21:56 ` [cocci] " Julia Lawall
2025-12-04 6:07 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] asdf Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=960729bb-0746-4709-a40c-2e254f963deb@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@jfarr.cc \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.ambardar@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox