* [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: fix charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh test
@ 2024-08-21 12:31 David Hildenbrand
2024-08-21 15:59 ` Mina Almasry
2024-08-26 14:16 ` Mario Casquero
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2024-08-21 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kselftest, David Hildenbrand, Mario Casquero,
Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan, Muchun Song, Mina Almasry
Currently, running the charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh selftest we can
sometimes observe something like:
$ ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2
...
write_result is 0
After write:
hugetlb_usage=0
reserved_usage=10485760
killing write_to_hugetlbfs
Received 2.
Deleting the memory
Detach failure: Invalid argument
umount: /mnt/huge: target is busy.
Both cases are issues in the test.
While the unmount error seems to be racy, it will make the test fail:
$ ./run_vmtests.sh -t hugetlb
...
# [FAIL]
not ok 10 charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2 # exit=32
The issue is that we are not waiting for the write_to_hugetlbfs process
to quit. So it might still have a hugetlbfs file open, about which
umount is not happy. Fix that by making "killall" wait for the process
to quit.
The other error ("Detach failure: Invalid argument") does not seem to
result in a test error, but is misleading. Turns out write_to_hugetlbfs.c
unconditionally tries to cleanup using shmdt(), even when we only
mmap()'ed a hugetlb file. Even worse, shmaddr is never even set for the
SHM case. Fix that as well.
With this change it seems to work as expected.
Fixes: 29750f71a9b4 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests")
Reported-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
.../selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh | 2 +-
.../testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c | 21 +++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
index d680c00d2853a..67df7b47087f0 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ function cleanup_hugetlb_memory() {
local cgroup="$1"
if [[ "$(pgrep -f write_to_hugetlbfs)" != "" ]]; then
echo killing write_to_hugetlbfs
- killall -2 write_to_hugetlbfs
+ killall -2 --wait write_to_hugetlbfs
wait_for_hugetlb_memory_to_get_depleted $cgroup
fi
set -e
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
index 6a2caba19ee1d..1289d311efd70 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ enum method {
/* Global variables. */
static const char *self;
-static char *shmaddr;
+static int *shmaddr;
static int shmid;
/*
@@ -47,15 +47,17 @@ void sig_handler(int signo)
{
printf("Received %d.\n", signo);
if (signo == SIGINT) {
- printf("Deleting the memory\n");
- if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
- perror("Detach failure");
+ if (shmaddr) {
+ printf("Deleting the memory\n");
+ if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
+ perror("Detach failure");
+ shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
+ exit(4);
+ }
+
shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
- exit(4);
+ printf("Done deleting the memory\n");
}
-
- shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
- printf("Done deleting the memory\n");
}
exit(2);
}
@@ -211,7 +213,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
exit(2);
}
- printf("shmaddr: %p\n", ptr);
+ shmaddr = ptr;
+ printf("shmaddr: %p\n", shmaddr);
break;
default:
--
2.46.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: fix charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh test
2024-08-21 12:31 [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: fix charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh test David Hildenbrand
@ 2024-08-21 15:59 ` Mina Almasry
2024-08-21 16:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-26 14:16 ` Mario Casquero
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mina Almasry @ 2024-08-21 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, Mario Casquero,
Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan, Muchun Song
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:31 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, running the charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh selftest we can
> sometimes observe something like:
>
> $ ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2
> ...
> write_result is 0
> After write:
> hugetlb_usage=0
> reserved_usage=10485760
> killing write_to_hugetlbfs
> Received 2.
> Deleting the memory
> Detach failure: Invalid argument
> umount: /mnt/huge: target is busy.
>
> Both cases are issues in the test.
>
> While the unmount error seems to be racy, it will make the test fail:
> $ ./run_vmtests.sh -t hugetlb
> ...
> # [FAIL]
> not ok 10 charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2 # exit=32
>
> The issue is that we are not waiting for the write_to_hugetlbfs process
> to quit. So it might still have a hugetlbfs file open, about which
> umount is not happy. Fix that by making "killall" wait for the process
> to quit.
>
> The other error ("Detach failure: Invalid argument") does not seem to
> result in a test error, but is misleading. Turns out write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> unconditionally tries to cleanup using shmdt(), even when we only
> mmap()'ed a hugetlb file. Even worse, shmaddr is never even set for the
> SHM case. Fix that as well.
>
> With this change it seems to work as expected.
>
> Fixes: 29750f71a9b4 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests")
> Reported-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Initially I thought it could be nice to split fixes for the 2 issues
in separate patches in case one of them ends up needing a revert or
something, but probably not worth a respin. Fixes look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh | 2 +-
> .../testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c | 21 +++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> index d680c00d2853a..67df7b47087f0 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ function cleanup_hugetlb_memory() {
> local cgroup="$1"
> if [[ "$(pgrep -f write_to_hugetlbfs)" != "" ]]; then
> echo killing write_to_hugetlbfs
> - killall -2 write_to_hugetlbfs
> + killall -2 --wait write_to_hugetlbfs
This looks correct. I don't think I expected killall not to wait.
> wait_for_hugetlb_memory_to_get_depleted $cgroup
> fi
> set -e
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> index 6a2caba19ee1d..1289d311efd70 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ enum method {
>
> /* Global variables. */
> static const char *self;
> -static char *shmaddr;
> +static int *shmaddr;
> static int shmid;
>
> /*
> @@ -47,15 +47,17 @@ void sig_handler(int signo)
> {
> printf("Received %d.\n", signo);
> if (signo == SIGINT) {
> - printf("Deleting the memory\n");
> - if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
> - perror("Detach failure");
> + if (shmaddr) {
> + printf("Deleting the memory\n");
> + if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
> + perror("Detach failure");
> + shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> + exit(4);
> + }
> +
> shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> - exit(4);
> + printf("Done deleting the memory\n");
> }
> -
> - shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> - printf("Done deleting the memory\n");
This seems like a simple refactor to only delete when shmaddr is set,
looks fine to me.
> }
> exit(2);
> }
> @@ -211,7 +213,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> exit(2);
> }
> - printf("shmaddr: %p\n", ptr);
> + shmaddr = ptr;
> + printf("shmaddr: %p\n", shmaddr);
>
Setting shmaddr seems correct and an oversight. I don't see shmaddr
set anywhere in the current code.
> break;
> default:
> --
> 2.46.0
>
--
Thanks,
Mina
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: fix charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh test
2024-08-21 15:59 ` Mina Almasry
@ 2024-08-21 16:04 ` David Hildenbrand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2024-08-21 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mina Almasry
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, Mario Casquero,
Andrew Morton, Shuah Khan, Muchun Song
On 21.08.24 17:59, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:31 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently, running the charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh selftest we can
>> sometimes observe something like:
>>
>> $ ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2
>> ...
>> write_result is 0
>> After write:
>> hugetlb_usage=0
>> reserved_usage=10485760
>> killing write_to_hugetlbfs
>> Received 2.
>> Deleting the memory
>> Detach failure: Invalid argument
>> umount: /mnt/huge: target is busy.
>>
>> Both cases are issues in the test.
>>
>> While the unmount error seems to be racy, it will make the test fail:
>> $ ./run_vmtests.sh -t hugetlb
>> ...
>> # [FAIL]
>> not ok 10 charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2 # exit=32
>>
>> The issue is that we are not waiting for the write_to_hugetlbfs process
>> to quit. So it might still have a hugetlbfs file open, about which
>> umount is not happy. Fix that by making "killall" wait for the process
>> to quit.
>>
>> The other error ("Detach failure: Invalid argument") does not seem to
>> result in a test error, but is misleading. Turns out write_to_hugetlbfs.c
>> unconditionally tries to cleanup using shmdt(), even when we only
>> mmap()'ed a hugetlb file. Even worse, shmaddr is never even set for the
>> SHM case. Fix that as well.
>>
>> With this change it seems to work as expected.
>>
>> Fixes: 29750f71a9b4 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests")
>> Reported-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
>> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> Initially I thought it could be nice to split fixes for the 2 issues
> in separate patches in case one of them ends up needing a revert or
> something, but probably not worth a respin. Fixes look good to me.
I was debating with myself as well if it should be separated, but
decided to go the simple route of a single patch :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: fix charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh test
2024-08-21 12:31 [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: fix charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh test David Hildenbrand
2024-08-21 15:59 ` Mina Almasry
@ 2024-08-26 14:16 ` Mario Casquero
2024-08-26 14:18 ` Mario Casquero
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mario Casquero @ 2024-08-26 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, Andrew Morton,
Shuah Khan, Muchun Song, Mina Almasry
This patch has been successfully tested. All hugetlb kernel selftests pass now.
# SUMMARY: PASS=12 SKIP=0 FAIL=0
Tested by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:31 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, running the charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh selftest we can
> sometimes observe something like:
>
> $ ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2
> ...
> write_result is 0
> After write:
> hugetlb_usage=0
> reserved_usage=10485760
> killing write_to_hugetlbfs
> Received 2.
> Deleting the memory
> Detach failure: Invalid argument
> umount: /mnt/huge: target is busy.
>
> Both cases are issues in the test.
>
> While the unmount error seems to be racy, it will make the test fail:
> $ ./run_vmtests.sh -t hugetlb
> ...
> # [FAIL]
> not ok 10 charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2 # exit=32
>
> The issue is that we are not waiting for the write_to_hugetlbfs process
> to quit. So it might still have a hugetlbfs file open, about which
> umount is not happy. Fix that by making "killall" wait for the process
> to quit.
>
> The other error ("Detach failure: Invalid argument") does not seem to
> result in a test error, but is misleading. Turns out write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> unconditionally tries to cleanup using shmdt(), even when we only
> mmap()'ed a hugetlb file. Even worse, shmaddr is never even set for the
> SHM case. Fix that as well.
>
> With this change it seems to work as expected.
>
> Fixes: 29750f71a9b4 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests")
> Reported-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh | 2 +-
> .../testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c | 21 +++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> index d680c00d2853a..67df7b47087f0 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ function cleanup_hugetlb_memory() {
> local cgroup="$1"
> if [[ "$(pgrep -f write_to_hugetlbfs)" != "" ]]; then
> echo killing write_to_hugetlbfs
> - killall -2 write_to_hugetlbfs
> + killall -2 --wait write_to_hugetlbfs
> wait_for_hugetlb_memory_to_get_depleted $cgroup
> fi
> set -e
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> index 6a2caba19ee1d..1289d311efd70 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ enum method {
>
> /* Global variables. */
> static const char *self;
> -static char *shmaddr;
> +static int *shmaddr;
> static int shmid;
>
> /*
> @@ -47,15 +47,17 @@ void sig_handler(int signo)
> {
> printf("Received %d.\n", signo);
> if (signo == SIGINT) {
> - printf("Deleting the memory\n");
> - if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
> - perror("Detach failure");
> + if (shmaddr) {
> + printf("Deleting the memory\n");
> + if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
> + perror("Detach failure");
> + shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> + exit(4);
> + }
> +
> shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> - exit(4);
> + printf("Done deleting the memory\n");
> }
> -
> - shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> - printf("Done deleting the memory\n");
> }
> exit(2);
> }
> @@ -211,7 +213,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> exit(2);
> }
> - printf("shmaddr: %p\n", ptr);
> + shmaddr = ptr;
> + printf("shmaddr: %p\n", shmaddr);
>
> break;
> default:
> --
> 2.46.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: fix charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh test
2024-08-26 14:16 ` Mario Casquero
@ 2024-08-26 14:18 ` Mario Casquero
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mario Casquero @ 2024-08-26 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-kselftest, Andrew Morton,
Shuah Khan, Muchun Song, Mina Almasry
Missing the hyphen :)
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 4:16 PM Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> This patch has been successfully tested. All hugetlb kernel selftests pass now.
> # SUMMARY: PASS=12 SKIP=0 FAIL=0
>
> Tested by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:31 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, running the charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh selftest we can
> > sometimes observe something like:
> >
> > $ ./charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2
> > ...
> > write_result is 0
> > After write:
> > hugetlb_usage=0
> > reserved_usage=10485760
> > killing write_to_hugetlbfs
> > Received 2.
> > Deleting the memory
> > Detach failure: Invalid argument
> > umount: /mnt/huge: target is busy.
> >
> > Both cases are issues in the test.
> >
> > While the unmount error seems to be racy, it will make the test fail:
> > $ ./run_vmtests.sh -t hugetlb
> > ...
> > # [FAIL]
> > not ok 10 charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh -cgroup-v2 # exit=32
> >
> > The issue is that we are not waiting for the write_to_hugetlbfs process
> > to quit. So it might still have a hugetlbfs file open, about which
> > umount is not happy. Fix that by making "killall" wait for the process
> > to quit.
> >
> > The other error ("Detach failure: Invalid argument") does not seem to
> > result in a test error, but is misleading. Turns out write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> > unconditionally tries to cleanup using shmdt(), even when we only
> > mmap()'ed a hugetlb file. Even worse, shmaddr is never even set for the
> > SHM case. Fix that as well.
> >
> > With this change it seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Fixes: 29750f71a9b4 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests")
> > Reported-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
> > Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh | 2 +-
> > .../testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c | 21 +++++++++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> > index d680c00d2853a..67df7b47087f0 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ function cleanup_hugetlb_memory() {
> > local cgroup="$1"
> > if [[ "$(pgrep -f write_to_hugetlbfs)" != "" ]]; then
> > echo killing write_to_hugetlbfs
> > - killall -2 write_to_hugetlbfs
> > + killall -2 --wait write_to_hugetlbfs
> > wait_for_hugetlb_memory_to_get_depleted $cgroup
> > fi
> > set -e
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> > index 6a2caba19ee1d..1289d311efd70 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/write_to_hugetlbfs.c
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ enum method {
> >
> > /* Global variables. */
> > static const char *self;
> > -static char *shmaddr;
> > +static int *shmaddr;
> > static int shmid;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -47,15 +47,17 @@ void sig_handler(int signo)
> > {
> > printf("Received %d.\n", signo);
> > if (signo == SIGINT) {
> > - printf("Deleting the memory\n");
> > - if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
> > - perror("Detach failure");
> > + if (shmaddr) {
> > + printf("Deleting the memory\n");
> > + if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
> > + perror("Detach failure");
> > + shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> > + exit(4);
> > + }
> > +
> > shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> > - exit(4);
> > + printf("Done deleting the memory\n");
> > }
> > -
> > - shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> > - printf("Done deleting the memory\n");
> > }
> > exit(2);
> > }
> > @@ -211,7 +213,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> > exit(2);
> > }
> > - printf("shmaddr: %p\n", ptr);
> > + shmaddr = ptr;
> > + printf("shmaddr: %p\n", shmaddr);
> >
> > break;
> > default:
> > --
> > 2.46.0
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-26 14:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-21 12:31 [PATCH v1] selftests/mm: fix charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh test David Hildenbrand
2024-08-21 15:59 ` Mina Almasry
2024-08-21 16:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-26 14:16 ` Mario Casquero
2024-08-26 14:18 ` Mario Casquero
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox