From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f69.google.com (mail-it0-f69.google.com [209.85.214.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB8D6B0279 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 22:50:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-f69.google.com with SMTP id v184so4499384itc.15 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.158.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u6si953743wmu.2.2017.06.14.19.50.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v5F2nPbe023942 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 22:50:51 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2b39wpa2u0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 22:50:51 -0400 Received: from localhost by e38.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:50:50 -0600 Subject: Re: [HELP-NEEDED, PATCH 0/3] Do not loose dirty bit on THP pages From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" References: <20170614135143.25068-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20170614165513.GD17632@arm.com> <548e33cb-e737-bb39-91a3-f66ee9211262@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:20:32 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <548e33cb-e737-bb39-91a3-f66ee9211262@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <95a2756a-dd56-e042-95ed-90f4078e0380@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Will Deacon Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Vineet Gupta , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Ralf Baechle , "David S. Miller" , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com On Thursday 15 June 2017 06:35 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > W.r.t pmdp_invalidate() usage, I was wondering whether we can do that > early in __split_huge_pmd_locked(). > BTW by moving pmdp_invalidate early, we can then get rid of pmdp_huge_split_prepare(vma, haddr, pmd); -aneesh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org