linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	 kent overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
	 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	 anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	 Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	 linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arch/um: fix forward declaration for vmalloc
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:11:00 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95819052.15033.1713816660761.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240326073750.726636-1-surenb@google.com>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>
> Betreff: [PATCH 1/1] arch/um: fix forward declaration for vmalloc

> Patch [1] replaced vmalloc() function with a new definition but it did
> not adjust the forward declaration used in UML architecture. Change it
> to act as before.
> Note that this prevents the vmalloc() allocations in __wrap_malloc()
> from being accounted. If accounting here is critical, we will have
> to remove this forward declaration and include vmalloc.h, however
> that would pull in more dependencies and would require introducing more
> architecture-specific headers, like asm/bug.h, asm/rwonce.h, etc.
> This is likely the reason why this forward declaration was introduced
> in the first place.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240321163705.3067592-31-surenb@google.com/
> 
> Fixes: 576477564ede ("mm: vmalloc: enable memory allocation profiling")

This commit id is not in Linus tree.
Do I miss something?

Thanks,
//richard


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-26  7:37 Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-03-26 15:37 ` SeongJae Park
2024-03-28  8:48 ` Johannes Berg
2024-04-22 20:11 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2024-04-22 20:19   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-04-22 20:31     ` Richard Weinberger
2024-04-22 20:39       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-04-22 20:50         ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95819052.15033.1713816660761.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox