From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: limit count of partial slabs scanned to gather statistics
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:12:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9579b38f-87a2-269a-7598-f857394bc0a9@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6e6adc8-eb65-d04f-aace-03121586752a@yandex-team.ru>
On 5/7/20 7:25 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On 06/05/2020 14.56, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 5/4/20 6:07 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>> To get exact count of free and used objects slub have to scan list of
>>> partial slabs. This may take at long time. Scanning holds spinlock and
>>> blocks allocations which move partial slabs to per-cpu lists and back.
>>>
>>> Example found in the wild:
>>>
>>> # cat /sys/kernel/slab/dentry/partial
>>> 14478538 N0=7329569 N1=7148969
>>> # time cat /sys/kernel/slab/dentry/objects
>>> 286225471 N0=136967768 N1=149257703
>>>
>>> real 0m1.722s
>>> user 0m0.001s
>>> sys 0m1.721s
>>>
>>> The same problem in slab was addressed in commit f728b0a5d72a ("mm, slab:
>>> faster active and free stats") by adding more kmem cache statistics.
>>> For slub same approach requires atomic op on fast path when object frees.
>>
>> In general yeah, but are you sure about this one? AFAICS this is about pages in
>> the n->partial list, where manipulations happen under n->list_lock and shouldn't
>> be fast path. It should be feasible to add a counter under the same lock, so it
>> wouldn't even need to be atomic?
>
> SLUB allocates objects from prepared per-cpu slabs, they could be subtracted from
> count of free object under this lock in advance when slab moved out of this list.
>
> But at freeing path object might belong to any slab, including global partials.
Right, freeing can indeed modify a global partial without taking the lock.
Nevermind then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 16:07 Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-05-04 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2020-05-05 5:46 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-05-08 3:18 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-05-04 21:19 ` David Rientjes
2020-05-05 6:20 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-05-06 11:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-05-07 5:25 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-05-07 14:12 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2020-05-06 19:06 ` Qian Cai
2020-05-07 3:01 ` Qian Cai
2020-05-07 3:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-07 5:15 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2020-05-07 18:24 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9579b38f-87a2-269a-7598-f857394bc0a9@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=wenyang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox