From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
joe@perches.com, brouer@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kfree_rcu() should use kfree_bulk() interface
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 00:16:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <954a9ea2-5202-4ee3-1fa2-21acf8d07cdb@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180404022347.GA17512@bombadil.infradead.org>
On 04/03/2018 07:23 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 05:55:55PM -0700, Rao Shoaib wrote:
>> On 04/03/2018 01:58 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> I think you might be better off with an IDR. The IDR can always
>>> contain one entry, so there's no need for this 'rbf_list_head' or
>>> __rcu_bulk_schedule_list. The IDR contains its first 64 entries in
>>> an array (if that array can be allocated), so it's compatible with the
>>> kfree_bulk() interface.
>>>
>> I have just familiarized myself with what IDR is by reading your article. If
>> I am incorrect please correct me.
>>
>> The list and head you have pointed are only usedA if the container can not
>> be allocated. That could happen with IDR as well. Note that the containers
>> are allocated at boot time and are re-used.
> No, it can't happen with the IDR. The IDR can always contain one entry
> without allocating anything. If you fail to allocate the second entry,
> just free the first entry.
>
>> IDR seems to have some overhead, such as I have to specifically add the
>> pointer and free the ID, plus radix tree maintenance.
> ... what? Adding a pointer is simply idr_alloc(), and you get back an
> integer telling you which index it has. Your data structure has its
> own set of overhead.
The only overhead is a pointer that points to the head and an int to
keep count. If I use idr, I would have to allocate an struct idr which
is much larger. idr_alloc()/idr_destroy() operations are much more
costly than updating two pointers. As the pointers are stored in
slots/nodes corresponding to the id, I wouldA have to retrieve the
pointers by calling idr_remove() to pass them to be freed, the
slots/nodes would constantly be allocated and freed.
IDR is a very useful interface for allocating/managing ID's but I really
do not see the justification for using it over here, perhaps you can
elaborate more on the benefits and also on how I can just pass the array
to be freed.
Shoaib
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-04 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 17:22 [PATCH 0/2] Move kfree_rcu out of rcu code and use kfree_bulk rao.shoaib
2018-04-03 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c rao.shoaib
2018-04-03 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] kfree_rcu() should use kfree_bulk() interface rao.shoaib
2018-04-03 20:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-04 0:55 ` Rao Shoaib
2018-04-04 2:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-04 7:16 ` Rao Shoaib [this message]
2018-04-04 8:39 ` Rao Shoaib
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-02 5:31 [PATCH 0/2] Move kfree_rcu out of rcu code and use kfree_bulk rao.shoaib
2018-04-02 5:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] kfree_rcu() should use kfree_bulk() interface rao.shoaib
2018-04-02 7:13 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-02 17:20 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-04-04 7:28 ` Rao Shoaib
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=954a9ea2-5202-4ee3-1fa2-21acf8d07cdb@oracle.com \
--to=rao.shoaib@oracle.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox