From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
osalvador@suse.de, liuzixing@hygon.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mm/hugetlb: wait for hugetlb folios to be freed
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 18:22:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <950cae5a-bff0-49e6-8fe4-a2447c63d8bc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17ad5bf5-545c-4418-8d08-459ce6ef54cb@126.com>
On 18.02.25 13:19, Ge Yang wrote:
>
>
> 在 2025/2/18 19:45, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>> On 18.02.25 12:40, yangge1116@126.com wrote:
>>> From: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>
>>>
>>> Since the introduction of commit c77c0a8ac4c52 ("mm/hugetlb: defer
>>> freeing
>>> of huge pages if in non-task context"), which supports deferring the
>>> freeing of hugetlb pages, the allocation of contiguous memory through
>>> cma_alloc() may fail probabilistically.
>>>
>>> In the CMA allocation process, if it is found that the CMA area is
>>> occupied
>>> by in-use hugetlb folios, these in-use hugetlb folios need to be migrated
>>> to another location. When there are no available hugetlb folios in the
>>> free hugetlb pool during the migration of in-use hugetlb folios, new
>>> folios
>>> are allocated from the buddy system. A temporary state is set on the
>>> newly
>>> allocated folio. Upon completion of the hugetlb folio migration, the
>>> temporary state is transferred from the new folios to the old folios.
>>> Normally, when the old folios with the temporary state are freed, it is
>>> directly released back to the buddy system. However, due to the deferred
>>> freeing of hugetlb pages, the PageBuddy() check fails, ultimately leading
>>> to the failure of cma_alloc().
>>>
>>> Here is a simplified call trace illustrating the process:
>>> cma_alloc()
>>> ->__alloc_contig_migrate_range() // Migrate in-use hugetlb folios
>>> ->unmap_and_move_huge_page()
>>> ->folio_putback_hugetlb() // Free old folios
>>> ->test_pages_isolated()
>>> ->__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock()
>>> ->PageBuddy(page) // Check if the page is in buddy
>>>
>>> To resolve this issue, we have implemented a function named
>>> wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios(). This function ensures that the hugetlb
>>> folios are properly released back to the buddy system after their
>>> migration
>>> is completed. By invoking wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios() before calling
>>> PageBuddy(), we ensure that PageBuddy() will succeed.
>>>
>>> Fixes: c77c0a8ac4c52 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in
>>> non-task context")
>>> Signed-off-by: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> +void wait_for_freed_hugetlb_folios(void)
>>> +{
>>> + flush_work(&free_hpage_work);
>>
>> BTW, I was wondering if we could optimize out some calls here by sensing
>> if there is actually work.
>>
> for_each_hstate(h) {
> if (hugetlb_vmemmap_optimizable(h)) {
> flush_work(&free_hpage_work);
> break;> }
> }
> Is this adjustment okay?
I think that's better, except that it would still trigger in scenarios
where hugetlb is completely unused if
CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP is around.
Can't we check hpage_freelist?
if (llist_empty(&hpage_freelist))
return;
flush_work(&free_hpage_work);
It should be able to deal with races (we don't care if something is
getting added concurrently, only if there is something right now).
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 11:40 yangge1116
2025-02-18 11:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-18 12:19 ` Ge Yang
2025-02-18 17:22 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-02-19 3:40 ` Ge Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=950cae5a-bff0-49e6-8fe4-a2447c63d8bc@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuzixing@hygon.cn \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangge1116@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox