Hi

From: Xiang Gao <gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com>

Fix three typos in comments:

- Line 112: "zome_reclaim_mode" -> "zone_reclaim_mode"
- Line 6208: "prioities" -> "priorities"
- Line 7067: "that that high" -> "that the high" (duplicated word)

Signed-off-by: gaoxiang17 <gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 0fc9373e8251..710fbe1ee151 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ struct scan_control {
 	/* zone_reclaim_mode */
 	unsigned int may_unmap:1;
 
-	/* zome_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
+	/* zone_reclaim_mode, boost reclaim, cgroup restrictions */
 	unsigned int may_swap:1;
 
 	/* Not allow cache_trim_mode to be turned on as part of reclaim? */
@@ -6205,7 +6205,7 @@ static void consider_reclaim_throttle(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 	if (current_is_kswapd() || cgroup_reclaim(sc))
 		return;
 
-	/* Throttle if making no progress at high prioities. */
+	/* Throttle if making no progress at high priorities. */
 	if (sc->priority == 1 && !sc->nr_reclaimed)
 		reclaim_throttle(pgdat, VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS);
 }
@@ -7064,7 +7064,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
 
 		/*
 		 * There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if
-		 * enough pages are already being scanned that that high
+		 * enough pages are already being scanned that the high
 		 * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
 		 */
 		if (kswapd_shrink_node(pgdat, &sc))

LGTM

Reviewed by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>

-Donet