* Re: 回复: [PATCH] mm: Fixed incorrect comment for _kmem_cache_create function
[not found] <DM6PR22MB1836791E3AA65BB61B3FE933C5959@DM6PR22MB1836.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
@ 2023-04-11 2:42 ` Bagas Sanjaya
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-04-11 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhao xinchao
Cc: cl, penberg, akpm, rientjes, iamjoonsoo.kim, vbabka, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On 4/10/23 21:45, zhao xinchao wrote:
> The meaning of 'others' is non zero.
>
> This function has three return positions. In addition to successfully return 0, the first failed position will return - E2BIG, and the second position will return Non zero value for setup_cpu_cache function failure.
>
>
OK. Please send v2 with all error return values described.
Also, don't send HTML email (like one I'm replying to - mailing lists
reject it) and don't top-post; reply inline with appropriate context
instead.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-04-11 2:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <DM6PR22MB1836791E3AA65BB61B3FE933C5959@DM6PR22MB1836.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
2023-04-11 2:42 ` 回复: [PATCH] mm: Fixed incorrect comment for _kmem_cache_create function Bagas Sanjaya
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox